{"id":1621,"date":"2003-08-17T10:52:31","date_gmt":"2003-08-18T00:52:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/michaelhans.com\/eclecticism\/2003\/08\/17\/howard-deanspammer\/"},"modified":"2019-12-06T08:29:06","modified_gmt":"2019-12-06T16:29:06","slug":"howard-deanspammer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/michaelhans.com\/eclecticism\/2003\/08\/17\/howard-deanspammer\/","title":{"rendered":"Howard Dean&#8230;spammer?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Will all due respect, someone in the Dean Team needs to get <a href=\"http:\/\/www.feedster.com\/search.php?hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=howard+dean+spam&amp;btnG=Search&amp;sort=date\" title=\"Feedster search for 'howard dean spam'\">this issue<\/a> sorted out quickly. There&#8217;s a growing hubbub over the apparent fact that the Dean campaign at one point contracted with two e-mail vendors who then <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cleverhack.com\/blog\/archives\/000785.html\" title=\"Howard Dean Spam\">started spamming<\/a> Dean campaign e-mails to people who had not requested them.<\/p>\n<p>While it appears that the Dean campaign has discontinued their contract with the vendors (according to <a href=\"http:\/\/yro.slashdot.org\/comments.pl?sid=75018&amp;cid=6718555\" title=\"\/.: Is the Dean campaign spamming?\">this \/. comment<\/a>), a single comment left in the midst of a <a href=\"http:\/\/yro.slashdot.org\/article.pl?sid=03\/08\/17\/1624206&amp;tid=\" title=\"\/.: Is the Dean campaign spamming?\">\/. thread<\/a>, which I only found because it was linked to from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cleverhack.com\/blog\/archives\/000785.html\" title=\"Howard Dean spam\">Joy&#8217;s post<\/a>, isn&#8217;t going to be seen by many people, and I&#8217;ve seen this issue get mentioned on more and more blogs (like <a href=\"http:\/\/silentrunning.tv\/archives\/002852.html\" title=\"Spam spam spam spam\">this one<\/a>) each day.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;d suggest that the Dean campain make an official statement on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.blogforamerica.com\/\" title=\"Blog for America\">their weblog<\/a>. While it may make for momentary run of slightly bad press, it won&#8217;t be nearly as bad as if the meme of &#8216;Howard Dean as spammer&#8217; continues to spread.<\/p>\n<dl>\n<dt>[Update]{.underline}<\/dt>\n<dd>\n[This C&#124;Net story] on the controversy, dated 8\/18\/03, leads off with the statement from the Dean campaign admitting their mistake and reiterating that they have cancelled their account with the e-mail vendors in question.\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<blockquote><p>\n  Howard Dean&#8217;s presidential campaign acknowledged on Monday that it had spammed an undisclosed number of people with unsolicited political advertisements.<\/p>\n<p>  The campaign said Dean, the former Democratic governor of Vermont, remained opposed to unsolicited bulk e-mail and blamed the spamming on two contractors who had promised to contact only people who had specifically requested to receive the advertisements.<\/p>\n<p>  &#8220;We recently contracted with two vendors who made assurances that their lists were opt-in only,&#8221; the campaign said in an e-mail to CNET News.com. &#8220;On Tuesday, August 12th, Dean for America received notification from a supporter that spam was being sent. We terminated our relationship with both vendors immediately.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Hopefully this all settles down soon. In my view, it was definitely a mistake, but mistakes happen.<\/p>\n<p>Update:<\/p>\n<p>Wired also has <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wired.com\/news\/politics\/0,1283,60086,00.html\" title=\"Dean E-mail sends wrong message\">a story about this<\/a>, mentioning that there were two waves of spam messages sent out, and the second didn&#8217;t seem to actually originate from the Dean campaign.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\n  As for the Dean for America campaign, staffers there are less concerned with where the second message came from than with how to handle the aftermath of the first one.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>While it appears that the Dean campaign has discontinued their contract with the vendors, a single comment left in the midst of a \/. thread isn&#8217;t going to be seen by many people.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[2042],"tags":[14],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelhans.com\/eclecticism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1621"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelhans.com\/eclecticism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelhans.com\/eclecticism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelhans.com\/eclecticism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelhans.com\/eclecticism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1621"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/michaelhans.com\/eclecticism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1621\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelhans.com\/eclecticism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1621"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelhans.com\/eclecticism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1621"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelhans.com\/eclecticism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1621"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}