{"id":52885,"date":"2026-06-30T08:29:17","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T15:29:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/michaelhans.com\/eclecticism\/?p=52885"},"modified":"2026-06-30T08:29:17","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T15:29:17","slug":"the-ai-compass","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/michaelhans.com\/eclecticism\/2026\/06\/30\/the-ai-compass\/","title":{"rendered":"The AI Compass"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/bambamramfan.github.io\/ai-compass\/\">This &#8220;AI Compass&#8221; test<\/a> was interesting. As with most such tests, it&#8217;s not perfect, and I have some quibbles with some of the questions and answers, particularly some where I think it falls into the usual trap of using &#8220;AI&#8221; for everything, and not adequately distinguishing between genAI and machine learning (ML), but still, not bad.<\/p>\n<p>My result:<\/p>\n<figure>\n<img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/michaelhans.com\/eclecticism\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Screenshot-2026-06-30-at-8.20.33-AM.png\" alt=\"Four-quadrant scatter plot. The vertical axis is good \/ bad, the horizontal axis is overhyped \/ transformative. My result is a point slightly on the &quot;overhyped&quot; side of the horizaontal axis and about two-thirds of the way towards the &quot;bad&quot; extreme of the vertical axis.\" width=\"398\" height=\"420\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-52886\" srcset=\"https:\/\/michaelhans.com\/eclecticism\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Screenshot-2026-06-30-at-8.20.33-AM.png 398w, https:\/\/michaelhans.com\/eclecticism\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Screenshot-2026-06-30-at-8.20.33-AM-284x300.png 284w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 398px) 100vw, 398px\"><figcaption>I&#8217;m the glowy orange dot. Looks like I&#8217;m right on the border, almost ending up classified as &#8220;The Skeptic&#8221; (full description below). (Side note: Pity about the poor and very inaccessible color design.)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<blockquote><p>\n  YOU ARE&#8230;<br>\n  <b>The Union Organizer<\/b><br>\n  patron saint: Cory Doctorow.<br>\n  AI is a real tool being used to extract real labor value from real people without paying them. You don&#8217;t care about the singularity \u2014 you care about the artists, writers, and workers getting strip-mined by capital. You&#8217;re not anti-technology. You&#8217;re anti-theft.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Looking at the full list of possible outcomes, I&#8217;d self-identify as one of the following. I think it&#8217;s my hedging slightly on some of the answers because of the genAI\/ML confusion that pushed me into the result I got. They&#8217;re all in the same general &#8220;don&#8217;t like it, don&#8217;t trust it, don&#8217;t want it&#8221; quadrant, though.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\n  <b>The Luddite (Affectionate)<\/b><br>\n  patron saint: Emily Bender<br>\n  It doesn&#8217;t work the way they claim, it&#8217;s making everything worse, and you&#8217;d like your internet back, please. You can explain in precise technical detail why it&#8217;s a stochastic parrot, and you will, whether or not anyone asked. You&#8217;re funnier about this than people give you credit for.<\/p>\n<p>  <b>The Digital Hermit<\/b><br>\n  patron saint: Jaron Lanier<br>\n  You&#8217;ve been saying the framing is wrong since before most people had heard of any of this. AI is less a technology than a story Silicon Valley tells to consolidate power, and the story is bad. You read physical books and you don&#8217;t need a language model to tell you what they mean.<\/p>\n<p>  <b>The Skeptic<\/b><br>\n  patron saint: Ed Zitron<br>\n  It&#8217;s oversold, it&#8217;s losing staggering amounts of money, and the harms are arriving faster than the value. You&#8217;ve done the math on the unit economics and it doesn&#8217;t close. You are loud about this, prolific about this, and you suspect history will vindicate you.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Union Organizer: AI is a real tool being used to extract real labor value from real people without paying them. You don&#8217;t care about the singularity \u2014 you care about the artists, writers, and workers getting strip-mined by capital. You&#8217;re not anti-technology. You&#8217;re anti-theft.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[2038],"tags":[1764],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelhans.com\/eclecticism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52885"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelhans.com\/eclecticism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelhans.com\/eclecticism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelhans.com\/eclecticism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelhans.com\/eclecticism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=52885"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/michaelhans.com\/eclecticism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52885\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelhans.com\/eclecticism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=52885"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelhans.com\/eclecticism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=52885"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelhans.com\/eclecticism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=52885"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}