{"id":9661,"date":"2016-03-16T15:22:58","date_gmt":"2016-03-16T22:22:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/michaelhans.com\/eclecticism\/?p=9661"},"modified":"2022-03-07T09:48:05","modified_gmt":"2022-03-07T17:48:05","slug":"2015-p-k-dick-award-nominee-rankings","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/michaelhans.com\/eclecticism\/2016\/03\/16\/2015-p-k-dick-award-nominee-rankings\/","title":{"rendered":"2015 P.K. Dick Award Nominee Rankings"},"content":{"rendered":"

My ranking of this year’s Philip K. Dick Award nominated books<\/a>, from least favorite to my top pick for the award (which, historically, has yet to match the actual award winner, so don’t put too much stock in my ranking):<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. After the Saucers Landed, by Douglas Lain<\/a>. Odd in ways that don’t resonate with me, and I found it rather boring.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
  2. \n

    (R)evoution, by P.J. Manney<\/a>. Some interesting ideas on transhumanism and nanotechnology, but too many of the characterizations really bothered me. Actually ended up disliking this one. Only takes fifth rather than sixth because at least I wasn’t bored.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  3. \n

    Archangel, by Marguerite Reed<\/a>. Not a bad book, but for some reason, failed to engage me.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  4. \n

    Windswept, by Adam Rakunas<\/a>. An entertaining adventure that made business-vs-union conflict more interesting than I would have guessed. Fun, but didn’t grab me the way I’d want a winner to do.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  5. \n

    Apex, by Ramez Naam<\/a>. The conclusion to a trilogy, with lots of near-future extrapolation of mind\/computer interfaces and enhancement and transhumanism. The end notes discussing today’s technology and how close we may actually be to some of what’s described in the books were particularly fascinating. Almost took the top spot, but in what is a personal and somewhat silly consideration, I tend to favor “standalone” books that handle all their worldbuilding over books that are later entries in a series, which benefit from all the plot and worldbuilding already established in the prior books.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  6. \n

    Edge of Dark, by Brenda Cooper<\/a>. More transhumanism, only this time from a far-future perspective, when once human entities banished from human space due to fears of what they were becoming return to human space. Well-realized and interesting characters, really neat possibilities for future technologically-enhanced evolution, and very believable conflict. Definitely my top pick.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    I was quite happy to see that the theme of \u201cdepressing trudging through postapocalyptic wastelands\u201d trend of the past few years wasn\u2019t represented at all in this year\u2019s pick, with transhumanism being the theme of half of this year\u2019s picks \u2014 much more along my particular interests.<\/p>\n

    Now, just over one week to wait until we learn who the winner is at this year\u2019s award ceremony!

    My ranking of this year’s Philip K. Dick Award nominated books, from least favorite to my top pick for the award (which, historically, has yet to match the actual award winner, so don’t put too much stock in my ranking).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2036],"tags":[2906,2900,2898,2902,61,1390,3600,4101,2894],"class_list":["post-9661","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-books","tag-adam-rakunas","tag-brenda-cooper","tag-douglas-lain","tag-marguerite-reed","tag-norwescon","tag-nwc39","tag-p-j-manney","tag-philip-k-dick-award","tag-ramez-naam"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelhans.com\/eclecticism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9661","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelhans.com\/eclecticism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelhans.com\/eclecticism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelhans.com\/eclecticism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelhans.com\/eclecticism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9661"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/michaelhans.com\/eclecticism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9661\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelhans.com\/eclecticism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9661"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelhans.com\/eclecticism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9661"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelhans.com\/eclecticism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9661"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}