This entry was published at least two years ago (originally posted on July 9, 2003). Since that time the information may have become outdated or my beliefs may have changed (in general, assume a more open and liberal current viewpoint). A fuller disclaimer is available.
Last February, dad noted a story that I then mentioned also, regarding the possibility that Stonehenge might have been intended to resemble feminine genetalia (cold, hard, and immobile — apparently the designer didn’t have a very good sex life).
Five months later, the story is spreading (so to speak). Looks like we got the scoop on this one, dad! ;)
(via Iki)