A look at the 2000 election

by
This entry was published at least two years ago (originally posted on September 24, 2004). Since that time the information may have become outdated or my beliefs may have changed (in general, assume a more open and liberal current viewpoint). A fuller disclaimer is available.

From Tom Goldstein on the SCOTUSBlog:

Many of you will have heard of and read the lengthy October 2004 Vanity Fair article by David Margolick et al. on the 2000 election litigation, with a focus on never-before-reported details about what happened inside the Supreme Court. The piece has received a great deal of attention inside the Court because, as the article details, “[a] surprising number of [law] clerks [from that term] talked to Vanity Fair.” Tony Mauro did a short piece on the article (subscription required), but given the new details the article contains, it has received surprisingly little press attention otherwise. Vanity Fair does not have a web-site, but we’re grateful to have received permission to post the piece itself, as it appears in the magazine. So here you are, in two pieces: Part 1 and Part 2.

I’ll be perusing this as soon as I can.

(via Political Wire, via Scripting News)