My lord. This website went overbudget and cost four million dollars. I need a web design job for the Australian government.
(via MeFi)
Enthusiastically Ambiverted Hopepunk
Stuff I find around the web that interests or amuses me.
My lord. This website went overbudget and cost four million dollars. I need a web design job for the Australian government.
(via MeFi)
Time Magazine has a special issue out now where to celebrate their 80th anniversary, they pick eighty days that changed the world — their choice for the 80 most important days of the past 80 years. Very, very cool, and I think it’ll be worth picking up a copy of the magazine, in addition to pouring through the web version.
Going through the dates they chose reminded me a lot of my ‘Where were you?’ post from a little over a year ago. I might tie the two together at some point. Or maybe not. Who knows?
(via MeFi)
Here’s an interesting ongoing art/design project: The news in type. Each day, the designer is taking one headline and finding a way to render it typographically. Quite a few good interpretations in there — this is another of my favorites.
(via Jason Kottke)
San Francisco photographer Michael Koller is working on a project he calls Seamless City — a continously stitched together photograph of a thirty mile walk around San Francisco.
(via BoingBoing)
Well, yeah, okay, so it’s the 2^nd^ now. In lieu of actually posting any sort of joke, a few fun April Fool’s links:
First off, two self-links (because my ego is just that out of control). Neither of these were April Fools posts, but they fit in with the spirit of the day — just me having fun.
Other fun links:
Well, I conquered the world tonight. Twice actually. Now all I need to do is find someone who…
Might be a tall order there, actually.
This has got to be the single worst headline I think I’ve ever seen.
From MSN’s Slate magazine: The Supreme Court tries sodomy
Right there in the courtroom?
From the BBC this evening: Children “having sex at 11”
That’s nothing. In my day we had sex at 11 and 11:30.
Found this on Antipixel today, and it reminded me of this old joke I’ve had bouncing around in my head for years:
Celluloid factory burns down. No film at 11.
Ever been unsure about the distinction between ‘an historic’ and ‘a historic’? The question came up in a thread here recently and I did some investigating.
Well, here’s something that shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone with a modicum of intelligence — spell- and grammar-checking software doesn’t always help, and can often hinder good writing.
How might you drag a good writer’s work down to the level of a lesser scribe? Try the spell-check button.
A study at the University of Pittsburgh indicates spell-check software may level the playing field between people with differing levels of language skills, hampering the work of writers and editors who place too much trust in the software.
I’ve been ranting about this for years — most recently, back in September. Software checkers can only do so much, and there’s no substitute for a well-educated mind.