Politicizing Warfare

The Washington Monthly is asking about the fantasyland that George Bush seems to be living in, when waging a war in which the strategy seems to be based not on any real situations, but on election-year political situations.

[Our upcoming] election, and the political considerations that go along with it, have been driving our military strategy for the past two years. Before the war, we passed up a chance to take out terrorist mastermind Abu Musab Zarqawi — for political reasons. We invaded with too few troops — for political reasons. We lowballed the cost of the war — for political reasons. We ignored the UN and then turned around and pleaded for their help — for political reasons. Then we installed Iyad Allawi as president behind the UN’s back — for political reasons.

And just recently we’ve learned that the Marines were yo-yoed in and out of Fallujah — for political reasons. The president has bizarrely dismissed his own intelligence agencies’ analysis of Iraq as “guessing” — for political reasons. He’s ignored the advice of his own generals about troop requirements for the upcoming [Iraqi] elections — for political reasons. And assaults on Baathist enclaves have been postponed until December — for fairly obvious political reasons.

And things just keep going downhill.

(via Atrios)

A look at the 2000 election

From Tom Goldstein on the SCOTUSBlog:

Many of you will have heard of and read the lengthy October 2004 Vanity Fair article by David Margolick et al. on the 2000 election litigation, with a focus on never-before-reported details about what happened inside the Supreme Court. The piece has received a great deal of attention inside the Court because, as the article details, “[a] surprising number of [law] clerks [from that term] talked to Vanity Fair.” Tony Mauro did a short piece on the article (subscription required), but given the new details the article contains, it has received surprisingly little press attention otherwise. Vanity Fair does not have a web-site, but we’re grateful to have received permission to post the piece itself, as it appears in the magazine. So here you are, in two pieces: Part 1 and Part 2.

I’ll be perusing this as soon as I can.

(via Political Wire, via Scripting News)

Are you better off?

Ontario Emperor pointed out a series of graphs from Buzzflash highlighting some of the numbers behind how our country is doing. Not that surprising if you’ve been paying attention, but certainly interesting to see.

Unemployment

Job Creation

Stock Market

Budget Surplus/Deficit

The question, of course, is whether a Kerry presidency would have numbers close to what Clinton’s produced, and there’s really no way of knowing that at this stage in the game. I’d hate to see where these graphs end up after four more years of Bush, however.

iTunes “Seedy Films” by Soft Cell from the album Non-Stop Erotic Cabaret (1981, 5:04).

Derailing the Peace Train

I saw this while flipping through the paper yesterday on lunch, and thought it was fairly ridiculous, and now the story is making it’s way across the ‘net: the United States is now safely protected from the evil Cat Stevens.

A London-to-Washington flight was diverted to Maine on Tuesday when it was discovered passenger Yusuf Islam – formerly known as singer Cat Stevens – was on a government watch list and barred from entering the country, federal officials said.

United Airlines Flight 919 was en route to Dulles International Airport when the match was made between a passenger and a name on the watch list, said Nico Melendez, a spokesman for the Transportation Security Administration. The plane was met by federal agents at Maine’s Bangor International Airport around 3 p.m., Melendez said.

Homeland Security Department spokesman Dennis Murphy identified the passenger as Islam. “He was interviewed and denied admission to the United States on national security grounds,” Murphy said, and would be put on the first available flight out of the country Wednesday.\”

I guess someone got tired of hearing Peace Train

(Via Boing Boing and Len.)

Coalition of the Unwilling

Costa Rica has requested that its name be stricken from the White House’s ‘Coalition of the Willing’, saying their support was for the War on Terrorism, not the invasion of Iraq.

Costa Rica’s Constitutional Court has ruled that the country’s name cannot be included by the United States as part of a “coalition” in the Iraq conflict, and Costa Rican officials are demanding their country be stricken from the list.

Costa Rica apparently never formally joined the U.S.-led coalition, but its name was listed on a White House Web page of coalition members, sparking outrage in a country where the Iraq war is enormously unpopular.

Following Wednesday’s ruling, Costa Rica – which never sent any troops to Iraq, in part because it has no army – is making it clear it does not want to be listed as a member of the coalition.

A White House Web site still had the country listed on Thursday. The U.S. Embassy said it was still reviewing the court’s action and had no immediate comment.

(via Jacqueline)

Vote for Kerry, Lose Your Job

And I thought I got fired for a bad reason — my story doesn’t even begin to compare to this woman who lost her job because she is a John Kerry supporter.

“We were going back to work from break, and my manager told me that Phil [the owner] said to remove the sticker off my car or I was fired,” she said. “I told him that Phil couldn’t tell me who to vote for. He said, ‘Go tell him.'”

She went to Gaddis’ office, knocked on the door and entered on his orders.

“Phil and another man who works there were there,” she said. “I asked him if he said to remove the sticker and he said, ‘Yes, I did.’ I told him he couldn’t tell me who to vote for. When I told him that, he told me, ‘I own this place.’ I told him he still couldn’t tell me who to vote for.”

Gobbell said Gaddis told her to “get out of here.”

“I asked him if I was fired and he told me he was thinking about it,” she said. “I said, ‘Well, am I fired?’ He hollered and said, ‘Get out of here and shut the door.'”

She said her manager was standing in another room and she asked him if that meant for her to go back to work or go home. The manager told her to go back to work, but he came back a few minutes later and said, ” ‘I reckon you’re fired. You could either work for him or John Kerry,’ ” Gobbell said.

“I took off my gloves and threw them in the garbage and left,” Gobbell said.

I’m so glad we live in a country where personal beliefs and freedom of expression are constitutionally protected.

(via Lane)

[Update (because this is what happens when I’m a week behind):]{.underline}

Turns out this story had a happy ending after only a couple days — according to Slate, Gobbel has been offered a job with the Kerry campaign.

The story was picked up by Daily Kos, a political Web log, and spread quickly around the Web. By this morning, Geddes, who has declined to comment publicly on the matter, had apparently had enough of the bad publicity. Through an intermediary, he offered Gobbell an apology and said she could have her old job back. But Gobbell said she wouldn’t return without some written guarantee that Geddes wouldn’t turn around and fire her once he was out of the spotlight. Then, late this afternoon, Kerry himself phoned Gobbell. “He was telling me how proud he was that I stood up,” Gobbell told me. “He’d read the part where Phil said I could either work for him or work for John Kerry. He said, ‘you let him know you’re working for me as of today.’ I was just so shocked.”

Gobbell accepted Kerry’s job offer, “so I reckon I’ll be working for John Kerry.” Kerry left it that someone from his campaign would call Gobbell to work out the details.

[…]

[Update, Sept. 17: I checked in with Gobbell this afternoon. “I go to work in the local [Kerry] office Monday,” she said. Kerry is matching her salary at Enviromate and is giving her health benefits. Gobbell is very happy about the latter because Enviromate (you won’t be surprised to learn) did not. Gobbell was vague about what her duties will be, but she said, “a little bit of traveling may be involved.”]

[Update, Sept. 20: Stancil reports in today’s Decatur Daily that Gobbell is set to travel to Florida on this, her first day working for Kerry, to tell her story to CNN, among others. Already, she told Stancil, she has appeared on 15 to 20 talk radio shows. Apparently telling the story of her firing by Enviromate is more or less going to be Gobbell’s job. This looks to me like a wise investment on Kerry’s part.]

(via Terrence)

Bush’s military timeline

Simon Woodside has created this handy-dandy timeline of President Bush’s military service, using official documents released by the White House and the military.

Bush's military service

iTunes “Introduction” by Atkins, Martin and the Chicago Industrial League from the album An Industrial Christmas Carol (1995, 14:00).

So are all photographers terrorists now?

Yet another “photography is terrorism” incident.

I was declared a terrorist, today. As I was walking around campus photographing art, buildings, cars, people, I was stopped by police.

The policemen asked who I was, what I was doing, why I was taking photographs, where I lived, all the good stuff. When I told them I was a student taking photographs for my own personal enjoyment (a concept they couldn’t comprehend); I was told this is illegal under the USA PATRIOT act.

I was greatly confused by this statement. My understanding is that I am legally allowed to take photographs of public buildings. I informed them of this and they were taken aback. They then went on to tell me that NJIT is not a public institution. They told me that it is publicly funded but not a public school. This is a blatant lie. If you visit NJIT’s website you see very clearly, “A Public Research University.”

Furthermore, the police refused to give me their information, even after I gave them my three pieces of ID (Rutgers, NJIT, and Driver’s License). I asked for their information and they told me they are from the precinct down the block. I didn’t want to push for their Badge Numbers as I had no paper with me. Instead I walked to the precinct and spoke with Sergeant Lincoln who told me to come back tomorrow and speak with him further on this matter.

Sergeant Lincoln was told it may be possible for me to get permission to take pictures on campus, until then I am a terrorist. He, too, did not give me their badge numbers.

(via Arcterex)

[![iTunes]] “Dreaming (Evolution)” by BT from the album Dreaming (2000, 10:09).

[iTunes]: http://images.apple.com/itunesaffiliates/logos/iTunes_sm_bdg61x15.png {width=”61″ height=”15″}

Votergasm!

Finally, a campaign I can get behind.

Um…so to speak.

Are you a Citizen, a Patriot — or an American Hero?

Citizen: I pledge to withhold sex from non-voters for the week following the election.

Patriot: I pledge to have sex with a voter on election night and withhold sex from non-voters for the week following the election.

American Hero: I pledge to have sex with a voter on election night and withhold sex from non-voters for the next four years.

Disclaimers:

  • Pledge-fulfilling sex must be consensual, legal, and generous. And safe. And hot.
  • Acceptable sexual positions include, but are not limited to: missionary, doggy-style, cowgirl, reverse cowgirl, leapfrog, butterfly, humpback whale, cling wrap, squashing of the deck chair, accordion, reverse piggy-back, advanced (“twin”) leapfrog. Male-male, female-female, group, and oral variations of these positions can also be used to satisfy the pledge.
  • Taking the pledge indicates a good-faith effort to abide by its provisions. Pledge-takers who have violated withholding provisions become effective non-voters, and are barred from sex with fellow pledge-takers.
  • Pledge-takers who fail to vote are forbidden from masturbating. (Exemption: pledge-takers who are not eligible to vote are encouraged to masturbate frequently.)
  • “Cybersex” does not satisfy the pledge, dorkwad.
  • Non-voters may render themselves eligible for sex with American Heroes by voting at least twice in local, primary, and/or 2006 congressional races. Those voting in only one such race qualify to perform, but not receive, oral sex on American Heroes.
  • Achievement of a Votergasm during election-night sex is probable, but not guaranteed. Those encountering difficulty reaching Votergasm are encouraged to slow things down, talk about it, and reduce the pressure. Other techniques include the use of massage oils, toys, “dirty talk,” “ballot stuffing,” and “exit polls.”
  • Per the U.S. Constitution, children conceived on election night are eligible for gigantic interest-free loans from the U.S. government, and special t-shirts.

(via Rick)