Howard Dean, guest blogger

Larry Lessig, one of the top copyright lawyers in the nation (I believe), and a well-known personality in the blogosphere is going on vacation next week, and his replacement “guest blogger” is going to be none other than Howard Dean!

This is, I believe, the first time a presidential candidate has been a guest blogger. But it is an obvious extension of blogs and the process of becoming President. Campaigns are all about meeting different groups and talking about ideas. Where better than a blog?

It’ll be very interesting to see how this works out, and how much will be coming straight from Howard Dean, and how much will be coming from the Dean campaign. Either way, it’s a fascinating step for a presidential campaign to take.

To protect against any confusion about whether Governor Dean himself is writing the blog entries, he will crosspost everything that he posts on Lessig’s blog on this blog.

Looks like that should clear up any Dean/campaign staffer confusion — nicely done!

(via Escapable Logic, Jackie, Jeremy, cedar, Heiko, and Ken — okay, so I was one of the last to know…)

Debate time!

There’s a wonderful clip from Jon Stewart’s ‘Daily Show’ online right now — a debate betwen President George W. Bush and Presidential candidate Governor George W. Bush — that is flat-out hilarious (RealPlayer video file).

(via halfast)

Jon Stewart: Since the beginning of all this “Weapons of Mass Destruction”, “regime change”, “pockets of resistance”, “targets of opportunity” business, it’s been difficult to have an honest discussion about the direction President Bush is taking this country. In fact, when you combine the new madate that criticising the Commander in Chief is off limits in wartime with last year’s official disbanding of the Democratic Party, well, we’re left at an all-time low in the “good old-fashioned honest debate” category. Now, I know you’re thinking, “But Jon, every time I want to have a calm, honest discussion about these kinds of issues, I’m shouted down and harassed by the Dixie Chicks and their ilk.” Well, tonight, it all changes. We’re going to have an open, honest debate between the President of the United States and the one man we believe has the insight and the cojones to stand up to him. So first, joining us tonight, George W. Bush, 43^rd^ President of the United States. Welcome, Mr. President.

President George W. Bush: Good evening, I’m pleased to take your questions tonight.

JS: Well, thank you very much sir, I’m pleased to ask them. Taking the other side, joining us from the year 2000, Texas Governor and Presidential candidate, George W. Bush.

Governor George W. Bush: Good evening.

JS: Thank you, Governor. Mr. President, you won the coin toss, the first question will go to you. Why is the United States of America using it’s power to change governments in foreign countries?

PGWB: We must stand up for our security, and for the permanent rights, and for the hopes of mankind. The United States of America will make that stand.

JS: Well, certainly that represents a bold new doctrine in foreign policy, Mr. President. Governor Bush, do you agree with that?

GGWB: Yeah, I, I, I, I’m not so sure the role of the United States is to go around the world and say, “this is the way it’s gotta be.”

JS: All right, well that’s interesting. Ah, well that’s a, that’s a difference of opinion, and certainly that’s what this country is about, differences of opinion — Mr. President, let me just get specific. Why are we in Iraq?

PGWB: We, we will be, um, changing the regime of Iraq, for the good of the Iraqi people.

JS: Governor, then I’d like to hear your response on that.

GGWB: If we’re an arrogant nation they’ll, they’ll resent us. I think one way for us to end up being viewed as the “ugly American” is for us to go around the world saying, “we do it this way, so should you.”

JS: Well that’s, that’s an excellent point. Um, I don’t think you can argue with that. Ah, Mr. President, is the idea to just build a new country that we like better?

PGWB: We will tear down the apparatus of terror. And we will help you to build a new Iraq, that is prosperous, and free.

GGWB: I don’t think our troops ought to be used for what’s called “nation building.”

JS: Well that’s fair enough Governor, I mean certainly that’s, that’s, you’re entitled to that. But then, Governor, answer this — how do you propose we nation build? Would you use diplomacy?

GGWB: Lemme say this to you, I wouldn’t use force, I wouldn’t use force.

JS: Well, Mr. President, clearly you’re skeptical of the Governor. Now Governor, you sound categorically against the use of force. In your time in Texas, what have you done to demonstrate your willingness to be tough?

GGWB: Well, I’ve been standing up to big Hollywood, big trial lawyers, um…what was the question, it was about emergencies, wasn’t it?

JS: No, no it wasn’t. Getting back to Iraq, Mr. President, you’re as familiar with the Governor’s record in Texas as anybody. Are you willing, are you willing, Mr. President, to trust Governor Bush with our foreign policy?

PGWB: I’m not willing to take that chance again, Jon.

JS: Strong words, from two very different men. Now, as this debate draws to a close, I need to turn to the subject of money. Much of this discussion on foreign policy is moot if we can’t afford to pay for it. So, we’re running out of time, quickly, both of you, let’s talk numbers.

PGWB: I’m sending the Congress a wartime supplemental appropriations request of 74.7 billion dollars. To fund needs directly arising from the Iraqi conflict.

JS: 74.7 billion dollars appears to be within the realm of reason. Governor?

GGWB: Obviously tonight we’re going to hear some phony numbers about what I think and what we oughtta do.

JS: Wow. That’s a little vituperative. Well on that note, I’m going to thank both George W. Bushes for taking part tonight. In keeping with our debate rules, we will end our discussion with a trite and insincere farewell, Mr. President, you are the most powerful man in the world, you go first.

PGWB: Goodnight, and may God continue to bless America.

JS: Wow — incredibly insincere. Governor, can you top that?

GGWB: Thanks, thanks from the bottom of my heart.

JS: Nice. Wow. Now, this has been, I have really enjoyed this meeting of the minds, what a historic evening. It’s really one for the vaults, if only there were a secure place to put the videotape of this for all time. Where could we put it?

Al Gore: I think it should stay in a lockbox.

JS: I’m sorry, where, where should we put it?

AG: Lockbox, lockbox, lockbox.

JS: Well, you don’t have to shout. We’ll be right back…

Too funny!

Haiku

Another thing I like about the Dean campaign — they’re not afraid to have a sense of humor. Upon learning that Vermont Poet Laureate Grace Paley had lent her support to the Kuchinich campaign, the Dean campain issued this simple response to press querys:

The campaign goes on
We will one vote at a time
Take our country back

Politician-to-English translation

I love this from a Powell briefing in Africa:

But to think that somehow we went out of our way to insert this single sentence into the State of the Union address for the purpose of deceiving and misleading the American people is an overdrawn, overblown, overwrought conclusion.

It’s a non-denial denial!

“…went out of our way” — Who said the Bush administration ever needed to go out of its way to lie?

“…this single sentence…” — Right, the one that implied that Saddam was threatening us with nuclear weapons?

“…for the purpose of deceiving the American people…” — But for some other purpose it would be OK?

“…overdrawn, overblown, overwrought…” — Every “un” but “untrue”!

A good lawyer must have crafted that sentence, eh?

(via Lambert)

Howard Dean: Demand the truth

Howard Dean’s statment in response to the recent revelations (confirmations?) that the premise for the war in Iraq was based on lies:

Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld’s statement yesterday — that he only found out that the Niger documents were forgeries — “within recent days” was stunning.

What is now clear is that there are those in this administration that misled the President, misled the nation, and misled the world in making the case for the war in Iraq.

They know who they are. And they should resign today.

There will be investigations, and the truth will come out — the American people must know the truth — and those in this administration must be held accountable for their failure to give us the truth before we went to war.

But we do not need to wait for the investigations to rid these people from our government — they can resign on their own today.

I am now convinced more than ever that it was a mistake to have given this administration a blank check to engage in this war — as too many in Congress did when they supported the Iraqi war resolution.

The CBS report is being linked to all over the ‘net (as well it should be). Dean has set up a petition calling for the resignation of the guilty parties, and both Kuchinich and MoveOn have similar petitions.

(via Mathew Gross, Lambert, and Kos)

Is 'explosive' the best word to use?

U.S. report on 9/11 to be ‘explosive’:

A long-awaited final report on the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks will be released in the next two weeks, containing new information about U.S. government mistakes and Saudi financing of terrorists.

Former Rep. Tim Roemer, who served on the House Intelligence Committee and who has read the report, said it will be “highly explosive” when it becomes public.

[…]

The report will show that top Bush administration officials were warned in the summer of 2001 that the al Qaeda terrorist network had plans to hijack aircraft and launch a “spectacular attack.”

Hill would not discuss details of the report, but said it will contain “new information” about revelations made last year, when the joint House-Senate investigation held nine public hearings and 13 closed sessions.

The final report was completed in December. Since then a working group of Bush administration intelligence officials has “scrubbed” the report, objecting to additional public disclosures.

Could be very, very interesting.

But — keep in mind that no matter what the report contains, it has already been “scrubbed” by the Powers That Be. Who knows what was lost at that point. And, additionally, as Kos points out:

…people are going to play the expectations game. In this case, the administration has an interest in really hyping the report, leaking suggestions that it will be, well, “explosive”. That way the actual report can’t live up to the expectations and the press will think, “oh, it’s really not that bad”.

So who was the speech to?

Bush didn’t make any friends at his stop at the Senegalese island Goree yesterday. After touring the island site that was a launching ground for slave traders, Bush gave an anti-slavery speech. Unfortunately, all the residents of the island had been herded up and penned in a football stadium. So much for anti-slavery.

“We never want to see him come here again,” said N’diaye, hiking her loose gown onto her shoulders with a frown.

As the sun rose over Goree before Bush’s arrival, the only people to be seen on the main beach were U.S. officials and secret service agents. Frogmen swam through the shallows and hoisted themselves up to peer into brightly painted pirogues.

Normally, the island teems with tourists, Senegal’s ubiquitous traders, hawkers of cheap African art, photographers offering to take pictures and all the expected trappings of a tourist hot-spot in one of the world’s poorest countries.

On Tuesday, shutters on the yellow and red colonial-style houses remained shut. The cafes were closed and the narrow pier deserted, apart from security agents manning a metal detector, near the sandy beach. A gunship patrolled offshore.

“We understand that you have to have security measures, since September 11, but to dump us in another place…? We had to leave at 6 a.m. I didn’t have time to bathe, and the bread did not arrive,” the father-of-four said.

“We were shut up like sheep,” said 15-year-old Mamadou.

Absolutely disgusting.

(via Atrios)

S-11 Redux

I just stumbled across this video clip from the Guerrilla News Network — roughly 10 minutes of soundbites stitched together into a presentation that’s alternately frightening, funny, and poignant. Well worth the time to download and watch.

Culled from over 20 hours of television footage recorded over a one month period and across 13 networks, S-11 Redux is a sound-bite blitzkrieg that challenges the messages we have been fed from our mainstream media and the government it serves. Be warned — this video moves quickly and will require at least two viewings to digest its full impact.

(via grid)