This entry was published at least two years ago (originally posted on December 28, 2003). Since that time the information may have become outdated or my beliefs may have changed (in general, assume a more open and liberal current viewpoint). A fuller disclaimer is available.
The Seattle Times’ Pacific Northwest magazine has released their 2003 Pictures of the Year special issue, and all the shots have been posted on their website.
While some of the photos merely state the subject and what is happening, several include the thoughts of the photographers regarding the subject matter, how the photo was taken, and other such things. One of the things I enjoyed reading was how often these professional photographers deemed their shots “total luck” — it makes me feel better about my ratio of good shots to pure dreck. ;)
(via Spiel)
There are some excellent photos in there. I’m fond of the Birch trees in Moss.
The difference between an amateur and a professional photographer is.
Persistence. Patience. And 300 feet of film.
Theres one really sad picture… it’s in the spring gallery, third to last.