Blatant propaganda

The Village Voice takes a look at the upcoming “docudrama” DC 9/11:

The upcoming Showtime feature DC 9/11: Time of Crisis is a signal advance in the instant, ongoing fictionalization of American history, complete with the president fulminating most presidentially against “tinhorn terrorists,” decisively employing the word problematic in a complete sentence, selling a rationale for preemptive war, and presciently laying out American foreign policy for the next 18 months. “We start with bin Laden,” Bush (played by Timothy Bottoms) tells his cabinet. “That’s what the American people expect. . . . So let’s build a coalition for that job. Later, we can shape different coalitions for different tasks.”

[…]

The “Battle Hymn of the Republic” swells as Bush flies into ground zero, where he astonishes even Rove (Allan Royal) by spontaneously vaulting a police barricade to hop on the rubble and grab the microphone. A nearby fireman, compelled to tell the president that he didn’t vote for him, swears allegiance, mandating Bush to “find the son of a bitch who did this.” Once Bush realizes that “today, the president has to be the country,” Rove considers the image problem solved. Bush, he explains, has become commander in chief and taken back “control of his destiny.” The climax is Bush’s televised, prime-time September 20 speech—a montage of highly charged 9-11 footage that ends with the real-life, now fully authenticated Bush accepting the adulation of Congress as he fingers the talismanic shield worn by a fallen New York police officer.

What’s really scary is that people will eat this up, and accept it as the truth — and it’s a far, far cry from what really happened.

(via Len)

Outsourcing fund raising?

You’d think that if Bush was really concerned about keeping jobs in America, and getting Americans back to work, his campaign wouldn’t be outsourcing fund raising phone calls to India.

The US Republican Party now has a band of young and enthusiastic fund-raisers in Noida and Gurgaon.

HCL eServe, the business process outsourcing arm of the Shiv Nadar-promoted HCL Technologies, has bagged a project to undertake a fund-raising campaign for the US Republican Party over the telephone.

This is the first time such a project has been handed out to a company outside the US. The market research and public relations companies engaged by the party usually undertake such projects.

HCL eServe has put in place a team of 75 people to work on the project out of its call centres in Noida and Gurgaon. According to industry sources, the number of seats could be ramped up depending on the success of the campaign. These operators are required to call up people in the US seeking their support for President George W Bush and a donation for the Republican cause.

(via Tom Tomorrow)

Blogging from Afghanistan

Ben Hammersley, who’s generally a good read anyway, is currently working his way through Afghanistan. He’s been there for roughly a week now, and he’s been posting some really good stuff. Definitely worth adding to your list of reads. It’s a very, very different world from anything that I’m used to, that’s for sure. For instance…

Yesterday I moved from my hotel into the spare room of the house of the correspondent here for Radio France. Sebastian is trying to start a little side business by renting out rooms, drivers and LandCruiser he is about to buy, to visiting journos and documentary crews. His driver, Babrack, although probably not spelt that way, is an ex-Mujahadeen who credits Stallone’s performance in Rambo 3 for teaching him the correct technique for firing a rocket launcher and looking good at the same time.

Interview Me II: From Phil

The second of a few interviews with me, this one with questions courtesy of Phil. Rules come first…

  1. If you want to participate, leave a comment saying “interview me” (or something that gets that point across).
  2. I will respond by asking you five questions – each person’s will be different.
  3. You will update your journal with the answers to the questions.
  4. You will include this explanation and an offer to interview others in the same post.
  5. When others comment asking to be interviewed, you will ask them five questions.

…the interview comes next:

If someone offered to sponsor you to head back to college no matter the cost, would you accept, where would you go, and what would you study?

Would I accept? No question about that — definitely.

Where would I go? Not the foggiest. Off the top of my head, I’m fairly happy in Seattle right now, so the University of Washington is an obvious possibility, but I’m not going to say that’s the only possibility. Though…would an exchange program to a good university somewhere in Europe be out of the question? ;)

As for the “what”, three things immediately pop into my mind.

First off, and fairly obviously, it’d be a really good idea to get some sort of formal schooling and certification in computers. I’ve been working with them for years, and like to think that I’m not to shabby, but the downside to being self taught is that I’ve ended up something of a jack-of-all-trades. A little bit of experience across a wide field. As good as that is, it’s a little hard to put on a resume or job application, especially when none of the projects I’ve pursued have ended up with any sort of “proof” or certification.

Secondly, my original intent when I graduated high school was to be a theatre major. I was involved in high school theatre from my freshman year through my senior year, and then even for a couple years afterwards, as I was one of the few people around Anchorage who had any clue how the antiquated equipment in my high school’s theatre worked. I was only onstage once, but I had an absolute blast working on the tech crew the entire time I was involved.

Of course, if I were to pursue that, it’s a very good thing that I didn’t go into it back then. I’ve done a lot of growing into myself since then, and would be far more likely to be able to get onstage now. Back then, I was far too self-conscious to be able to be on stage. Now, though, I think that if I looked into it, I’d either not completely embarass myself — or if I did embarass myself, I’d at least be comfortable enough to have fun with it.

Lastly, one possibility that’s been bouncing around in my head for the past few years is going into teaching. I’ve had more than a few people mention that they could see me as a really good teacher — strong communication skills, a large amount of patience, an ability to get along with all sorts of people, and a genuine enthusiasm about the subjects I have an interest in. Were I to go that direction, it would have to be something in the arts or humanities (I am so not a math or science person) — history is a field that I’ve been thinking about. The older I get, the more fascinated I get not just in what’s going on around me, but in how we got where we are.

What’s the one thing you’d like to say to the MS flunkies at your workplace concerning the Mac vs. PC arguments?

Mostly, that in the end, it’s a silly argument. It can be a fun argument if you don’t approach it from a zealot’s point of view, but it’s essentially silly. What works for me works for me, and what works for them…well, it doesn’t really work that well, but they seem to be fine with that. ;)

Oh, and that I’m right and they’re wrong. Nyeah-nyeah. Windows 5uXX0rZ!

When it comes to having information available at your fingertips, are you a voracious consumer, or do you fear information overload?

Hrm…yes. I’m a voracious consumer, and I fear information overload. Or, rather, I revel in it. I’ve got 100-some sites subscribed to in NetNewsWire, and if I go for more than a day without checking in, I’m convinced I’m missing out on something incredibly important. I’m usually not, but the compulsion to find out is always there. Of course, the downside is that I can’t keep everything in my head, and I’m constantly saying that I “just read something about that…” but have no clue where I read what I’m talking about. But even then, as long as I’ve got Google, Feedster, or Technorati, than I’m good to go.

If you could instantly master one skill you know nothing about now, what would it be and why?

Muppets. No matter how much of a tech geek I may be, or how much I may enjoy the latest and greatest CGI special effects extravaganza, every time I watch the behind-the-scenes documentary on either Labyrinth or The Dark Crystal I’m spellbound by the magic that these craftsmen can produce. Taking simple (and some not-so-simple) foam rubber puppets and giving them such incredible, believable life creates a spell that no CGI can equal. Given the time and expertise, it’s hard for me to imagine a more perfect and fun job than being able to be part of Jim Henson’s Creature Shop.

Do you have your G5 yet?

Not yet — mid to late September is the current expected ship date.

Interview Me I: From Kirsten

The first of a few interviews with me, this one with questions courtesy of Kirsten. Rules come first…

  1. If you want to participate, leave a comment saying “interview me” (or something that gets that point across).
  2. I will respond by asking you five questions – each person’s will be different.
  3. You will update your journal with the answers to the questions.
  4. You will include this explanation and an offer to interview others in the same post.
  5. When others comment asking to be interviewed, you will ask them five questions.

…the interview comes next:

Aside from your geeky aspirations (computer learning and acquisition) what is one big goal you have for yourself right now? What have you done to reach it, and what do you still need to do?

Getting back into school is a big one. When I first went into college, I couldn’t quite hack it, and ended up dropping out mid-way through my first semester. For the next few years I was fine with that — I’d gone on to find a job, and I’ve worked steadily since then — but over the past couple years, getting back into school has been popping up in my head more and more often.

As far as achieving that goal…well, so far, I’ve pretty much done a whole lot of nothing. Lots of discussions and scenarios tossed around, but not a whole lot beyond that. The biggest thing I need to work on is simply figuring out how to juggle scheduling and finances: right now, I’m working full-time (cutting into most school’s class hours) and need just about every paycheck (so laying out the thousands of dollars for school isn’t easy). I’m not quite living paycheck-to-paycheck, but some months I’m still a lot closer to that than I’d like to be. So, I need to figure out how to do school and work at the same time, how to pay for school, and how to pay for everything else. Not impossibilities, obviously, there are plenty of other people doing all that, but the initial hurdle is fairly large.

You recently posted a picture of yourself from your days at CTY, mentioning the relief you found in meeting similarly-minded kids. What kind of a kid were you? What were your favorites – colors, candies, cartoons, pastimes – what were your pet peeves – what did you want to be when you grew up – and what was one of the defining moments of your childhood?

Oh, ugh. In many, many ways, I was the stereotypical “geek” child. Far too smart for my own good, with the corresponding lack of social skills (intelligence and socialbility are all too often inversely proportional). I was in all the advanced classes in school, my parents apparently had the option of having me skip a grade of school offered to them nearly every year I was in elementary school (which they never did, and I’m now quite happy that they made that decision), I played the violin (clumsily), and spent most of my free time either in front of the family’s computer or with my nose buried in a book.

At the same time, I was constantly doing horribly in school (I’d test well, so everyone knew I was absorbing the information, but I never could be bothered with the homework), I didn’t have any really close friends until 4th grade (and even then, I only really found one), my brother and I could never seem to get along, and I was constanly butting heads with my parents. They wanted me to live up to my potential, I wanted them to stop pushing me and constantly pushed back through avoiding any and all responsibilities.

I wanted to be accepted for who I was — and yet, I had no clue who I was. At the same time that I was perpetually upset with the world around me for not accepting me, I couldn’t really accept myself. Always wanting to be more accepted by those around me, I’d bounce between trying to adjust to what I thought “everyone else” wanted, and rebelling against it all. What real personality I had was quickly suppressed, in a never-ending succession of facades that I thought would satisfy everyone else — but, of course, it never really worked, and I just got more disgusted, both with the world around me, and with myself.

So — combine a fairly high intellect with little to no social skills, no real personality of my own, a fair amount of self-loathing and major self esteem issues, and a general inability to cope with the world around me, and you end up with a rather remarkably maladjusted kid and teenager. In all honesty, I think that it’s a minor miracle that I’ve managed to end up as functional as I am today.

I don’t really remember too many favorites from when I was a kid. Transformers were a big one, I had a fairly large collection for a while, and always wanted more. Reading was virtually my only pasttime. I’ve always been a voracious reader — put something in front of my face with printed words on it, and it’ll get read, from books and magazines to cereal boxes and shampoo bottles.

Aside from a time when I thought that the coolest possible job in the world was to be a steamroller driver, I’ve never really had a good answer for the “what do you want to do when you grow up” question. I still don’t — but I’m still “growing up,” too. Ask me on my deathbed, and I might have an answer.

As far as a “defining moment” goes…well, Royce may very well kill me for this, but this is the first thing that popped into my head. He and I were out playing on the playground during recess. I was in 5th grade, but he’d skipped on to 6th grade after our 4th grade year. He decided to show off something he’d learned in English class that day, and went up to the top of a snow hill.

“C’mon, Mike! Come on up! I won’t not push you down!”

So, I climbed up — and as soon as I got to the top, he gave a shove, and down I went. I looked up from the bottom of the hill, pissed, and probably crying, while he laughed and explained double negatives to me, and how they cancel each other out.Royce and I have been good friends for years, but some small part of me has never completely forgiven him for that, and I think that’s why it sticks out in my head as a “defining moment” of my childhood. It encompasses many of the things that I remember from being a kid: being smart, but often feeling that I wasn’t “smart enough”, or “good enough”, because there was always someone who could turn things against me; being laughed at for doing something wrong; the betrayal by someone who I thought was a friend, and in general, just not “fitting in”, no matter what the situation was.

And yeah, some of those childhood issues are still jumbled up inside my head, and will occasionally come out to kick me around for a bit. I’ve got most of them fairly well taken care of by now (at least, I’m pretty sure I do), but there’s still some that can toss me for a loop. It’s a long, slow process at times, but I’m always making progress.

One morning you wake up, and you are inside a computer. Through the internet, you now have access to all other computers in all corners of the world – no tracking, no restrictions. With all that power (and the understanding that you will eventually wake up in your own bed again) – what are your top three destinations?

Oooooh, fun. Let’s see…

First stop: The one single, central, credit data repository (hey, this is a fantasy situtation after all) to give myself good credit.

Second stop: Whatever computer controls a decent lottery, enter myself, and win. One of the ones that gives you some thousands of dollars a year for 30-some years or so. Not enough to necessarily tempt me to completely stop working, but enough to give me a comfortable gauranteed income for a good amount of the rest of my life.

Third stop: The Pentagon data center, so I can see what’s really going on (unless you’re really paranoid, in which case I should probably make that the Illuminati’s central database). Oh, and managing to take a good couple terrabytes of evidence out with me would be good, too. ;)

If you had to dye one part of your body blue – permanently! – which part would you choose and why? Hair, fingernails, retinas, and internal organs don’t count!

It’s so tempting to make a “blue balls” joke here — but I think if I chose my genetalia (as a whole package or any particular part), while I may be able to make a good living in a freak show, it would probably unfavorably impact my sex life, so I’ll stay away from that particular area.

If it’s a simple dye job, as if I’d just dipped something into a vat of blue dye, I think I’d go for my feet. A possible fun conversation piece when I’m not wearing socks and shoes, but not something that’s going to be overly visible or get too many odd looks or questions when I’m out and about in the normal world.

If I can get a little more creative, I’d be tempted to do my back, if I could start with some form of stripe or design from the back of my head, down my neck, then flaring out into a backpiece of some sort. Pass it off as a really kick-ass tattoo.

Or I could just do this.

Recently you ‘came out’ about your polyamorous beliefs on your blog – in front of your friends, in front of your family, and in front of the world. How did it feel to do it? How do you feel now that it’s been said? Why do you feel polyamory is a better choice for you than traditional relationships?

Hmmm…you are coming up with the fun ones!

First off, I’m not entirely sure that ‘polyamorous‘ is quite the right term for where I’d place myself. At the same time, I’m not entirely sure what alternate term I’d choose, so I suppose we’ll have to go with that for now.

I was definitely a little nervous about putting that up. As I mentioned in the comment itself, it was originally going to be a private e-mail, but midway through I decided that I didn’t want to approach it that way. If I’m going to defend a lifestyle choice in part because of my own experiences, than I feel that I should be willing to do that publicly. I wasn’t sure what sort of response I’d get, and that was definitely a concern, but for some reason, at that point, it seemed like the right thing to do.

Now that it’s been said…well, admittedly, I still hesitate a bit. I’ve got to admit, seeing this question did raise my eyebrows — but not to the point of backing down. ;) The thing is, I don’t think that it’s a case of not wanting to talk about it, as much as it is that I’m still figuring out just where I want to go with my writing here. How personal do I want to get? I’m naturally a fairly private, closed person in many ways (likely strongly influenced by many of the things I mentioned in response to the question about my childhood), and so it’s often a little difficult for me to “open up” in a public setting. At the same time, it’s something I want to be more comfortable doing — I feel that my writing isn’t too terribly shabby, and my personal writing, when it appears, I tend to like better than my more generic “here’s something cool” or “here’s something that pisses me off” posts. So, I’m kind of trying to test my own boundaries in what I’m comfortable putting up here for the world to see.

As for why I feel that more “traditional” strictly monogamous relationships aren’t quite my cup of tea…I hate to do this, but I think I’m going to have to deferr a more complete answer for the moment. I just tried to come up with a answer that was coherent and yet brief enough for the scope of this interview format, and failed miserably three times. Extremely briefly:

I’ve always been very comfortable with being physically affectionate with people I’m close to (hugs, cuddling, etc.); I don’t believe that sexuality necessarily should or should not go hand-in-hand with affection (in other words, you don’t have to have sex to be in a relationship, nor do you have to be in a relationship to have sex); and I believe that it’s entirely possible to seperate the emotional “this is the person I’m in a relationship” with from the physical “oooh, wouldn’t they be fun to play with” urge. That said, I’m not wandering around eyeing everyone I see as a potential playmate, either — as a general rule, the only people I’m likely to find physically interested in are those that I’m already emotionally interested in, i.e., friends.

And, now that I’ve done a remarkably clumsy and probably fairly horrid job of answering that question, I’m out of questions from Kirsten. I’ve got two more sets of mini-interviews coming up soon, though, so never fear — you’ll have plenty of more clumsy self-refrential navel gazing coming soon!

Marriage 'by The Book'

The Public Nuisance has a wonderful idea: as long as the religious right is proposing a Constitutional Amendment that bases our national definition of marriage on Biblical standards, let’s go ahead and do just that. For example…

  • Marriage in the United States shall consist of a union between one man and one or more women. (Gen. 29, 17 – 28; II Sam. 3, 2 – 5)
  • Marriage shall not impede a man’s right to take concubines in addition to his wife or wives. (II Sam. 5:13; I Kings 11:3; II Chron 11:21)
  • A marriage shall be considered valid only if the wife is a virgin. If the wife is not a virgin, she shall be executed. (Deut. 22, 13 – 21)
  • Marriage of a believer and a non-believer shall be forbidden. (Gen 24:3; Num 25 1 – 9; Ezra 9:12; Neh. 10:30)
  • Since marriage is for life, neither this Constitution nor the constitution of any State, nor state or federal law, shall be construed to permit divorce. (Deut 22:19; Mark 10:9)
  • If a married man dies without children, his brother shall marry the widow. If he refuses to marry his brother’s widow or deliberately does not give her children, he shall pay a fine of one shoe and be otherwise punished in a manner to be determined by law. (Gen. 38 6 – 10; Deut 25 5 – 10)

He then goes on to follow up on some concerns brought up by his post, with some more good points:

Although it would be easy to get that impression, I want to make clear that I am not suggesting that the laws of the OT are absurd or barbaric. Whether you are a Jew, Christian, or secularist, it is important to remember that the laws were incredibly successful in their time and place. Like all laws, they were designed to ensure the community’s survival.

[…]

Those who wish to condemn gay marriage are free to do so. I myself have no problems with calling it a union or using some other term, so long as the legal rights of gay people are respected. But I do dislike it when those who advocate denying equal protection to gay people hide behind a few sentences in the Bible and say that they are merely expressing God’s immutable will.

(via Ex-Gay Watch via Anil)

Washington Post cribbing research from blogs?

RonK at the Daily Kos points out today that it appears the Washington Post’s Dana Millbank is doing a lot of research by reading weblogs.

Of late, our Dear Leader seems to have become Fair Game in the Big Media. And WaPo’s Dana Milbank seems to have been reading the blogs.

What’s the earlier blog reference you can find for each of the observations in Milbank’s 2003-08-26 column?

I can date two of the referenced items in the article (and did in Kos’ comment thread):

Flag desecration: July 25^th^, 2003 — I mentioned it here, via John via Kos via Wyeth.

Compassion: Aug. 20^th^, 2003 — I mentioned it here, via Atrios and Len via Kos via ‘K.Y.’.

I don’t mind at all if Millbank is discovering news items worth commenting on through the blog network — I certainly do it all the time — though I do wish that the sources for the individual items were sourced and given credit. I do my best to do that with each post that I pick up from someone else, it seems only fair for a real journalist to do the same.

Another lie

Analysts doubt U.S. claim on Iraqi drones

Huddled over a fleet of abandoned Iraqi drones, U.S. weapons experts in Baghdad came to one conclusion: Despite the Bush administration’s public assertions, these unmanned aerial vehicles weren’t designed to dispense biological or chemical weapons.

[…]

The unproven U.S. assertion regarding Iraq’s UAV programs is one among many.

American weapons hunters, like their U.N. counterparts, haven’t reported finding any chemical, biological weapons or nuclear weapons in Iraq so far.

Does this kind of thing surprise anyone anymore? If so — why? How can people keep fooling themselves into believing that Bush and his team did anything but lie to us for their own gain?

(via Bob Harris)

Why I hate George W. Bush

Alright, you asked for it. I’ll try to keep my wits about me, though the emotional base upon which this argument is built is quite tumultuous.

Why would I say that I “hate” George W. Bush? Isn’t that a little strong? Isn’t he just your average politician? Isn’t this just some natural extension of your overall left-leaning political views?

No, not really.

[…]

…the final mark of disrespect… the gut-level intuition that leads me to label him an EVIL man, rather than a merely despicable one is his casual contempt for human life. There aren’t words to describe the horror I feel when I see Bush look into the nation’s television cameras with that sadistic little smirk and tell us euphemistically, as if half-choking on a stifled snort that our enemies… “let’s put it this way: they are no longer a problem to the United States and our friends and allies.”

[…]

When I look at George W. Bush, I don’t see a patriot. I see a lying, psychopathic narcissist. And it pains me, it grieves me, it WOUNDS me to realize that this puts me not only in the minority… but in the “whacko fringe.”

— ‘Geoff’, Why I hate George W. Bush (via Len)