21/2023 – ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Not bad, but it as it turns out, I definitely prefer Brin’s novels to his short fiction. To my mind, he does better when he can really dive into something. His shorter works are missing a certain spark.
Enthusiastically Ambiverted Hopepunk
21/2023 – ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Not bad, but it as it turns out, I definitely prefer Brin’s novels to his short fiction. To my mind, he does better when he can really dive into something. His shorter works are missing a certain spark.
20/2023 – ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 1988 Hugo Best Novel
I find it kind of fascinating that Brin wrote his first three Uplift novels (particularly the second and third) as obviously connected and part of the same universe, but not directly continuing the story, even when the story is obviously unfinished. The events of Startide Rising are referred to and influence the events of this story, and the same overall mystery is a major driving element of both, but they’re otherwise unconnected. It’s a neat way to approach a very fully realized universe. I also really enjoy the way Brin creates aliens (both extraterrestrial and terrestrial) and other intelligences; close enough to human to be relatable, but also different enough to be alien. I’ve really enjoyed all of his first three Uplift novels, and one of these days plan to continue on to the second trilogy.
59/2022 – ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 1984 Hugo Best Novel
Dolphins in space! Which sounds jokey, but it’s not at all. Minimal connections to Sundiver, other than being in the same universe, but 200 years later. I really enjoyed this – the uplifted dolphins are a neat choice for a spacefaring crew, and Brin mixes in touches of plenty other alien races as they battle each other and chase the dolphins for the secret they stumbled across. Brin also does a good job of making this part of a much larger universe, dropping in bits and pieces and adding mysteries that don’t get solved, without making it frustrating or feeling like a tease.
58/2022 – ⭐️⭐️⭐️
A fun SF concept (exploring into the sun’s photosphere) that turns into an Agatha Christie-ish mystery (lampshaded with a “parlor scene” with evidence and accusations), all against a wider background seemingly based off the idea of “what if Erich von Däniken was right?”, which surprised and amused me.