21st Century Terrorism

This entry was published at least two years ago (originally posted on September 18, 2006). Since that time the information may have become outdated or my beliefs may have changed (in general, assume a more open and liberal current viewpoint). A fuller disclaimer is available.

Way back when, just after the 9-11 attacks, when the anthrax scares were going on, I was convinced that the people behind the anthrax mailings were going about their job all wrong. Mailing envelopes of powder to major names in major cities was good for immediate headlines, but really, did any of you really worry about coming across a packet full of anthrax? I know I didn’t. As long as they were targeting Dan Rather, it was obvious that most people didn’t have anything to worry about, unless they happened to be along the route of the envelope during its travels.

No, if these terrorists really wanted to get under people’s skins, they should have chosen anywhere from one to five small, out of the way, podunk little towns in the midwest. Some little burg in the middle of Nebraska, or Idaho, or Kansas, or Oklahoma. Pick one of those, grab the local phone book, and do a mass-mailing for whatever you can come up with, and dust all the mailers with anthrax (or your weapon of choice). It’s not immediate headlines, but once people realize that an entire town (or a few towns) in the middle of nowhere has been targeted (and potentially decimated) by a bioterror attack…that’s the kind of thing that is likely to get people’s attention.

Because that would be truly random. That would have been an American analogue to the bombings in the mideast — random, unpredictable, and deadly to anyone, not just Big Names.

And for the past week, that little mental exercise has been running through my head over and over as the current E. Coli spinach scare continues on. Each day more people get sick and reported contaminations pop up in more and more places — according to CNN, we’re up to 111 people ill, one dead, and cases reported in 21 states.

When the news reports started breaking, I thought that, while unlikely, this would be the perfect sort of terrorism attack. Don’t worry about having to get your ‘sleeper cells’ set up with bombs, pilots licenses, or anything that’s already been tried. Instead, just figure out enough biology and chemistry to mix up an effective E. Coli solution, put together some simple form of distribution mechanism (heck, today’s Super Soakers can be fitted with water-filled fanny packs…it doesn’t seem terribly hard to adapt a rig like that) with a tube running along the arm, then send your agents shopping. All they have to do is shop like they normally do, only as they’re handling the produce, they’re spraying a fine mist of bacteria over everything they touch or get near.

Simple. Effective. Random. And nearly untraceable.

Obviously, I have no idea if such a thing is actually what’s happening now, and it’s probably rather unlikely. The news reports briefly mention bioterror, only to say that it’s currently not a likely source (but it hasn’t entirely been ruled out, either). Still…it’s a possibility, and one I find a lot more likely than someone mixing their shampoo and conditioner into a high explosive that gets triggered with their iPod.

5 thoughts on “21st Century Terrorism”

  1. As a food worker for 25+ years this very thought came to my mind. However I wasn’t going to write about it because I didn’t want to give anyone any ideas.

  2. Heh. Must admit, I’m not too worried about either giving someone ideas or being on the FBI watchlist. In the first case, if I can come up with it, I’m sure plenty of other people have (you two are two examples of that already); secondly, I’ve posted enough ‘Bush needs to go’ rambling in the past that if I’m not on the FBI watchlist already, then they’ve figured out that I’m no real threat. :)

  3. The disadvantage of E. coli as a terror tactic is that it could (obviously) also result from non-terrorist activities. An anthrax-laden envelope, on the other hand, has no logical explanation other than as a terrorist act.

    To the FBI agent reading this: my address is…oh, you have it already.

  4. A previous commenter kind of addressed this already, but the one important thing a terrorist attack does is “be obvious that it’s someone trying to scare you,” and this (so far) lacks this.

    If over time, the infected produce shifts gradually to other available crops and there’s a group that claims it, I might have to change my mind, but I realy don’t think this is the case.

    “Undercover terrorism” seems hardly effective :)

Comments are closed.