Unintended consequences

A few months ago, I was contacted by a writer for a national magazine who wanted to interview me regarding my fallout with Microsoft. Turns out that the magazine he writes for was planning a story on some of the things that can suddenly and unexpectedly go wrong when weblogging (such as blogging yourself right out of a job). I was one of a few different webloggers interviewed for the story, and we spent about two days doing the interview in two phone sessions. It seemed to go pretty well, though at times I wondered if my story was a little on the boring side — no book offers, movie deals, incredible job offers or anything along those lines, just the incident itself and then life proceeded more or less as it normally does.

In any case, the interview was fun to do, and I was looking forward to eventually having my story (and possibly my photo) pop up on newsstands across America. Unfortunately, at the time the Powers That Be eventually decided that there wasn’t quite enough material (not just with me, but with all the other webloggers that were interviewed) for a full feature, and the story was shelved.

However, it appears that it’s possible that not all is lost. I got an e-mail yesterday from the reporter who interviewed me letting me know that there is an attempt being made to resurrect the story! To do so, though, they’re looking for more material — and here’s where you all come in, if you’re able and willing.

They’d like to expand the scope of the story to go beyond just employment difficulties, and include stories from people who have suddenly found their relationships affected by their weblogs. Here’s the note I got from the reporter:

Hey! The editors…are trying to ressurect our blogging story. So I just wanted to let you know that all hope has not been lost.

BUT, we’re desperately trying to find other “My Blog Ruined My Life” stories, esp. ones that have more to do with relationships than employment.

Can you please recommend any major blogging sites where I should look, or to contact their administrators, or, if you can tap into your readers and ask them if they’ve ever had a romantic/dating blowout w/ someone because of their blog — that’d be helpful.

Now, as I put this post together, I realize that this may strike some people as being rather sordid and muckraking — and, to be honest, for all I know it may be. However, at the time I was interviewed, that was not at all the impression I got from the gentleman who interviewed me. Yes, we were talking about some very unfortunate events in my life for a story about weblogging which focused on the problems that weblogs could cause, but at the time, I didn’t get the feeling that it was going to be overly sensationalistic in nature. It’s entirely possible that with the change of focus of the article, the tone may change as well — which, admittedly, would be something of a shame.

I’d hate to eventually find out that the final story focused solely on the “dark side” of weblogging, painting a picture of webloggers as a legion of sad, jobless and loveless souls pouring their hopes, dreams and inspirations out through their keyboards and onto the web in a desperate attempt to find justification and company in the few kindred souls that might end up poring over their writings in the wee hours of the morning, the wan light of the monitor washing over their skin as they avoid the troubling dreams that they know await them when they fall asleep.

(Whee — I like that. But anyway…)

Of course, I’m merely an interviewee, and as such, won’t really know what the final article will be like until it finally sees the light of day and hits the newsstands. But, really, I’d like to see the story come out, and so I turn to you, my loyal readers. If you know of any good resources or any potential interview subjects that may be willing to tell their stories, I’d love to hear about them so that I could pass them on to the reporter.

I’m sure that the venerable LiveJournal is a veritable fount of such stories, but I’m not active enough with LJ to know where too look or which communities to poke into. There’s also the web at large and the multitude of TypePad, Movable Type, WordPress, Blogger, and other assorted weblogging/journaling tools, but I don’t know of any stories that fit the bill off the top of my head.

So — anyone have some good pointers?

Update: I just sent the following to the reporter, expressing some of my concerns with the apparent new direction the article may be taking. Hopefully I’m not shooting myself in the foot and editing myself right out of the article with this, but the more I thought about it, the more it started to concern me.

I do have one concern, though, which I touch upon in my post (and which, admittedly, could be entirely unfounded…or even if it’s not, it may not be something you have any control over). At the time you interviewed me, I never got the impression that this was going to be an overly sensationalistic story, though it was dealing with some unfortunate circumstances. However, expanding the scope to include relationship issues, coupled with the “my blog ruined my life” concept — well, I now worry a bit that the story may end up painting a rather unflattering portrait of weblogs and webloggers in general.

While weblogs are becoming more known and more popular, there is still a large segment of the general population that sees them as nothing more than online journals for angst-ridden teenagers to whine to the world (often doing so with absolutely atrocious and nearly unreadable grammar, slang, and ”leet-speak’). One of the reasons your story interested me when you first contacted me (at a time when, to be honest, I was getting rather tired of rehashing the events around my dismissal) was that I got the impression that it was going to look at both the bad and the good of the situation and the aftermath, both for myself and for the other webloggers being contacted for the article. Now, though, I’m a little less sure of the tack that the final article will be taking.

Of course, I’m quite aware that I may be reading too much into what you sent me (and even if I’m not, it may be out of your hands). All in all, I’m just hoping for a good article, and wanted to let you know of some of my concerns. However it turns out, good luck with the current round of searching, and should I get any worthwhile pointers from the post on my site, I’ll pass them your way.

Spider Man 2

Completely on a whim tonight after getting home from work, I decided to head down to see if I could get into an opening-night showing of Spider Man 2. Grabbed a book for the pre-show wait, wandered down to the theater…and apparently the 11pm show that I picked wasn’t the most popular show around, as there were only three people already waiting when I showed up around 10:30pm, and by the time the show started, the theater was only about half full.

Not that that’s really anything to complain about, of course, since it got me choice seating. :)

Overall, Spider Man 2 is a lot of fun. Walking home and turning it over in my head, I kept coming back to the same basic thoughts I had about Spider Man, to the point where I was starting to wonder if I could simply re-post my thoughts about the first film. Obviously, I’m not doing that — not least because after re-reading my Spider Man post, I’m not quite as wild about Spider Man 2 as I was about the first — but there are some definite similarities.

In both films, the action is in many ways the true star of the film. Tobey Maguire is still perfect as Peter Parker/Spider Man, Kirsten Dunst is still oh-so-yummy as Mary Jane, and Alfred Molina absolutely steals the show as Doc Ock. Once again, though, it’s Sam Raimi‘s direction that shines through, and I really don’t think these films would be anywhere near as enjoyable with anyone else at the helm.

Doctor Otto Octavius is every bit as cool as I was hoping he’d be. The effects work on his cybernetic tentacles was incredibly done, and a character that stood a very good chance of ending up little more than laughable in being transitioned from the printed page to the screen instead became a very credible villain. In updating the good doctor to today’s world, the filmmakers dropped the idea of his controlling his extra arms telepathically (which I believe was the original idea) and instead have the arms controlled via a cybernetic link directly into the doctor’s spinal column. One of the tweaks I liked a lot was the addition of video cameras in the center of each arm’s ‘hand’, giving Doc Ock the ability to see anything one of his arms was pointing at. Nicely done, and it very much helps explain his ability to keep track of events going on around him during some of the melees that he and Spidey get into.

While the action sequences in general are certainly the high points of the movie — each of the battles between Spidey and Doc Ock are a blast to watch — there was one sequence that was by far my favorite. Just after the accident that permanently fuses the tentacles to Doc Ock’s body, he is taken to a hospital where surgeons plan to amputate the cybernetic apparatus in an attempt to save his life. The tentacles suddenly spring to life, and we’re thrust in to Sam Raimi at his lunatic best in a sequence that in many ways could be cut directly into The Evil Dead. With no music, the soundtrack filled with nothing but the screams, crashes, and general mayhem as the tentacles wreak havoc in the operating theater, Raimi pulls out all the stops and gives us all the crazy camera angles, whip-pans, zooms, and visual insanity that made the action sequences in The Evil Dead so much fun, and this fanboy ate up every single second of it.

As with the first film, though, Spider Man 2 is certainly not without its flaws. The abortive romance between Peter Parker and MJ often seems to just drag the film to a sudden halt whenever we switch back to their relationship — where Spider Man had a tendency to get overly-sappy, Spider Man 2 fails to give us any real reason why MJ would have any interest in Peter Parker at all. While the subplot is a necessity, both in motivating the characters to take some of their actions and in staying true to the original comic, it consistently fails to ever really engage the audience, and we’re left waiting for the villain to show up just to make things interesting again.

However, the biggest flaw for me was that the last ten minutes or so of the film didn’t feel like they were wrapping up the events at all — rather, it comes across as an extended trailer for the inevitable Spider Man 3. A pity, really, as even with its flaws, I’d definitely enjoyed the movie itself, and I ended up leaving the theater with a slightly sour feeling, as if the only thing missing before the credits rolled was a big “TO BE CONTINUED…” message splashed across the screen. These days, we all know that there’s likely going to be another chapter in the saga. Do we really need to have it beaten into our heads? Ah, well.

iTunes: “Pump Up the Volume” by M/A/R/R/S from the album Pump Up the Volume (1987, 7:12).

Categories Uncategorized Tags

Daring Fireball on Dashboard and Konfabulator

I haven’t poked my head into the Dashboard versus Konfabulator brouhaha for two reasons: firstly, I’m not a user of Konfabulator (looked at it, decided that it used far too much screen real estate for too little functionality, and that was that); and secondly, the whole thing seemed patently ridiculous to me.

However, John Gruber — who is far more qualified than I am to expound upon such things in any case — has done a masterful job of explaining why this is really a non-issue.

A sliding puzzle. A calculator. A clock. A little notepad. Tiny little applets — little pieces of software that are something less than full applications themselves, but which run alongside real apps and are easily accessed at any time.

Obviously, Apple ripped off the idea for Dashboard. Stolen wholesale, without even the decency to mention where they took the original idea.

Which, of course, would be the desk accessories from the original 1984 Macintosh — conceived by Bud Tribble and engineered (mostly) by Andy Hertzfeld.

[…]

The post-WWDC peanut gallery is atwitter with the idea that Tiger’s Dashboard is a blatant rip-off of Konfabulator. You can’t read anything about Dashboard without hearing that it’s a Konfabulator rip-off.

Bullshit. Dashboard is not a rip-off of Konfabulator. Yes, they are doing very much the same thing. But what it is that they’re doing was not an original idea to Konfabulator. The scope of a “widget” is very much the modern-day equivalent of a desk accessory.

The Mac community needs two things: more commentators like Gruber, and more people who listen to commentators like Gruber.

iTunes: “Goddess” by Soho from the album Goddess (1990, 5:13).

Tech Support Porn

The job market just keeps getting wierder. Consider this Portland Craigslist job posting, for instance…

Seeking qualified tech girls for specialized phone hostess positions.

Requirements:

You must be over 18.
You can be described as a “Tech Girl”, “Geek Chick” or “Network Ops Cutie”.
You need a pleasant speaking voice and able to talk “tech”.
Calls can become sensual so you need to be ok with that.
A fully clothed photo for our web site, although exhibitionists are preferred.
Be willing to take calls from those who find your certifications very sexy.

Please see our web site for more information: http://www.askthetechgirl.com/

There’s a devious, if sad, brilliance in this.

(via Something Positive)

iTunes: “Going to California” by Led Zeppelin from the album IV (1971, 3:35).

Apple’s getting into weblogging

Very interesting tidbit of information about the server version of OS X 10.4/Tiger in Apple’s preview pages: they’re including a ‘weblog server’ based on the blojsom project, which in itself is based on the blosxom weblogging software.

A new Weblog server in Tiger Server makes it easy to publish, distribute and syndicate web-based content. The Weblog server provides users with calendar-based navigation and customizable themes, is fully compatible with Safari RSS and enables posting entries using built-in web-based functionality or with weblog clients that support XML-RPC or the ATOM API. The Weblog Server, based on the popular open source project “Blojsom,” works with Open Directory for user accounts and authentication.

iTunes: “Gorgeous (Suspiria)” by Gene Loves Jezebel from the album World’s Greatest Club Collection, The (1998, 4:36).

NYT interview with Ron P. Reagan

There’s a very interesting interview with Ron P. Reagan (President Reagan’s son) in the Times today. I like the way this man thinks.

Now that the country is awash in Reagan nostalgia, some observers are predicting that you will enter politics. Would you like to be president of the United States?

I would be unelectable. I’m an atheist. As we all know, that is something people won’t accept.

[…]

Do you and your wife, Doria, have children?

No. We have three cats. It’s like having children, but there is no tuition involved.

[…]

How do you account for all the glowing obituaries of [your father]?

I think it was a relief for Americans to look at pictures of something besides men on leashes. If you are going to call yourself a Christian — and I don’t — then you have to ask yourself a fundamental question, and that is: Whom would Jesus torture? Whom would Jesus drag around on a dog’s leash? How can Christians tolerate it?

It is unconscionable. It has put our young men and women who are over there, fighting a war that they should not have been asked to fight — it has put them in greater danger.

Did you vote for Bush in the last election?

No. I did not.

How did your mother feel about being ushered to her seat by President Bush?

Well, he did a better job than Dick Cheney did when he came to the rotunda. I felt so bad. Cheney brought my mother up to the casket, so she could pay her respects. She is in her 80’s, and she has glaucoma and has trouble seeing. There were steps, and he left her there. He just stood there, letting her flounder. I don’t think he’s a mindful human being. That’s probably the nicest way I can put it.

[…]

One thing that Buddhism teaches you is that every moment is an opportunity to change. And we will have a moment in November to make a big change.

Damn skippy.

iTunes: “Lazarus Raised” by Gabriel, Peter from the album Passion: Music for The Last Temptation of Christ (1989, 1:25).

Apple Tiger banners at WWDC

I love it when Apple gets snippy…

Redmond, start your photocopiers.

Other banners sport the slogans “Introducing Longhorn,” “This should keep Redmond busy,” and “Redmond, we have a problem.”

(via MacMinute)

iTunes: “You Suck” by Consolidated feat. Yeastie Girls, The from the album Nettwerk Decadence (1992, 4:13).

Top 100 Grossing Movies of All Time

From Alicia, a list of the top 100 grossing movies of all time. Following in the footsteps (blogsteps?) of those before me in this particular meme, the movies that I have not seen are in bold.

  1. Titanic (1997) \$600,779,824
  2. Star Wars (1977) \$460,935,665
  3. E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (1982) \$434,949,459
  4. Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace (1999) \$431,065,444
  5. Spider-Man (2002) \$403,706,375
  6. Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King, The (2003) \$377,019,252
  7. Passion of the Christ, The (2004) \$370,025,697
  8. Jurassic Park (1993) \$356,784,000
  9. Shrek 2 (2004) \$356,211,000
  10. Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers, The (2002) \$340,478,898
  11. Finding Nemo (2003) \$339,714,367
  12. Forrest Gump (1994) \$329,691,196
  13. Lion King, The (1994) \$328,423,001
  14. Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone (2001) \$317,557,891
  15. Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring, The (2001) \$313,837,577
  16. Star Wars: Episode II – Attack of the Clones (2002) \$310,675,583
  17. Star Wars: Episode VI – Return of the Jedi (1983) \$309,125,409
  18. Independence Day (1996) \$306,124,059
  19. Pirates of the Caribbean (2003) \$305,411,224
  20. Sixth Sense, The (1999) \$293,501,675
  21. Star Wars: Episode V – The Empire Strikes Back (1980) \$290,158,751
  22. Home Alone (1990) \$285,761,243
  23. Matrix Reloaded, The (2003) \$281,492,479
  24. Shrek (2001) \$267,652,016
  25. Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (2002) \$261,970,615
  26. How the Grinch Stole Christmas (2000) \$260,031,035
  27. Jaws (1975) \$260,000,000
  28. Monsters, Inc. (2001) \$255,870,172
  29. Batman (1989) \$251,188,924
  30. Men in Black (1997) \$250,147,615
  31. Toy Story 2 (1999) \$245,823,397
  32. Bruce Almighty (2003) \$242,589,580
  33. Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981) \$242,374,454
  34. Twister (1996) \$241,700,000
  35. My Big Fat Greek Wedding (2002) \$241,437,427
  36. Ghost Busters (1984) \$238,600,000
  37. Beverly Hills Cop (1984) \$234,760,500
  38. Cast Away (2000) \$233,630,478
  39. Lost World: Jurassic Park, The (1997) \$229,074,524
  40. Signs (2002) \$227,965,690
  41. Rush Hour 2 (2001) \$226,138,454
  42. Mrs. Doubtfire (1993) \$219,200,000
  43. Ghost (1990) \$217,631,306
  44. Aladdin (1992) \$217,350,219
  45. Saving Private Ryan (1998) \$216,119,491
  46. Mission: Impossible II (2000) \$215,397,307
  47. X2 (2003) \$214,948,780
  48. Austin Powers in Goldmember (2002) \$213,079,163
  49. Back to the Future (1985) \$210,609,762
  50. Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me (1999) \$205,399,422
  51. Terminator 2: Judgment Day (1991) \$204,843,350
  52. Exorcist, The (1973) \$204,565,000
  53. Mummy Returns, The (2001) \$202,007,640
  54. Armageddon (1998) \$201,573,391
  55. Gone with the Wind (1939) \$198,655,278
  56. Pearl Harbor (2001) \$198,539,855
  57. Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade (1989) \$197,171,806
  58. Toy Story (1995) \$191,800,000
  59. Men in Black II (2002) \$190,418,803
  60. Gladiator (2000) \$187,670,866
  61. Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937) \$184,925,485
  62. Dances with Wolves (1990) \$184,208,848
  63. Batman Forever (1995) \$184,031,112
  64. Fugitive, The (1993) \$183,875,760
  65. Ocean’s Eleven (2001) \$183,405,771
  66. What Women Want (2000) \$182,805,123
  67. Perfect Storm, The (2000) \$182,618,434
  68. Liar Liar (1997) \$181,395,380
  69. Grease (1978) \$181,360,000
  70. Jurassic Park III (2001) \$181,166,115
  71. Mission: Impossible (1996) \$180,965,237
  72. Planet of the Apes (2001) \$180,011,740
  73. Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (1984) \$179,870,271
  74. Pretty Woman (1990) \$178,406,268
  75. Tootsie (1982) \$177,200,000
  76. Top Gun (1986) \$176,781,728
  77. There’s Something About Mary (1998) \$176,483,808
  78. Ice Age (2002) \$176,387,405
  79. Crocodile Dundee (1986) \$174,635,000
  80. Home Alone 2: Lost in New York (1992) \$173,585,516
  81. Elf (2003) \$173,381,405
  82. Air Force One (1997) \$172,888,056
  83. Rain Man (1988) \$172,825,435
  84. Apollo 13 (1995) \$172,071,312
  85. Matrix, The (1999) \$171,383,253
  86. Beauty and the Beast (1991) \$171,301,428
  87. Tarzan (1999) \$171,085,177
  88. Beautiful Mind, A (2001) \$170,708,996
  89. Chicago (2002) \$170,684,505
  90. Three Men and a Baby (1987) \$167,780,960
  91. Meet the Parents (2000) \$166,225,040
  92. Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves (1991)\$165,500,000
  93. Hannibal (2001) \$165,091,464
  94. Catch Me If You Can (2002) \$164,435,221
  95. Big Daddy (1999) \$163,479,795
  96. Sound of Music, The (1965) \$163,214,286
  97. Batman Returns (1992) \$162,831,698
  98. Bug’s Life, A (1998) \$162,792,677
  99. Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (2004) \$161,963,000
  100. Waterboy, The (1998) \$161,487,252

iTunes: “Gottes Tod (Dance or Die)” by Das Ich from the album Re_Laborat (2001, 5:09).

Apple announcements at WWDC 2004

Somehow in all of the weekend’s festivities, I’d managed to completely space that this week was the 2004 WWDC (and I call myself a Mac geek?), so coming home to start finding reports of new toys from Apple was a very pleasant surprise.

First off: their line of monitors has been updated, in a big way. And I do mean big — as in a 30\” widescreen LCD monitor. I so want one of those…and I so can’t afford it.

Secondly: a preview of Mac OS X 10.4, AKA Tiger. Wow — lots of yummylicious geek-flavored goodies in there. Most interesting to me are the metadata-centric search capabilities and Safari’s built-in RSS aggregator (which looks quite impressive). I’d be more excited about iChat’s conferencing capabilities, but I’ve got so few people on my iChat list with iSights that I have no clue if I’d ever have a chance to use it.

Really looking forward to getting my hands on some new toys to play with once they’re released!

iTunes: “Hawkmoon 269” by U2 from the album Rattle and Hum (1988, 6:22).

Orchids

One thing I stumbled across this weekend that I’d never seen before was the Volunteer Park Conservatory, which has five different sections filled with all manner of plants, from cacti to orchids. I’ll definitely want to head back up that way again and try to get some better shots, but for now…

Orchid

Orchid

Orchid

Orchid

Orchid

iTunes: “Pale Your Mind” by La Morte De La Maison from the album German Mystic Sound Sampler Vol. I (1990, 4:21).