Continuing in the spirit of my recent Star Trek posts (Discovering Deep Space Nine and ActiVision sues Viacom…over bad Star Trek), Iki proposes a new title for ‘Enterprise’: ST:WJOTFIU (or ‘Star Trek: We’re Just Out There Fucking It Up‘).
TV And Films
The shows and movies I like (or don’t).
ActiVision sues Viacom…over bad Star Trek
Activision, Inc., a leading developer, publisher and distributor of interactive entertainment software products, today announced that it has filed a breach of contract suit against Viacom. …through its actions and inactions, Viacom has let the once proud Star Trek franchise stagnate and decay. Viacom has released only one “Star Trek” movie since entering into agreement with Activision and has recently informed Activision it has no current plans for further “Star Trek” films. Viacom also has allowed two “Star Trek” television series to go off the air and the remaining series suffers from weak ratings. Viacom also frustrated Activision’s efforts to coordinate the development and marketing of its games with Viacom’s development and marketing of its new movies and television series.
(via Lane)
My first response? It’s about damn time! Trek has been going steadily downhill for quite a while now — I’m less than impressed with Enterprise, I’m being told to forego purchasing Voyager, and there hasn’t been a truly good Trek movie since Star Trek VI (First Contact came the closest, but I’ve got some definite issues with it, too). Whether it’s the fault of Viacom, Paramount, or the people writing and controlling the franchise, the fact is that it’s nowhere near where it was — nor where it likely could be.
However, that said — this seems pretty frivolous. Is it really Viacom’s purported mismanagement of the Trek franchise that is causing problems for ActiVision and their Trek-themed games? Or is it that the games themselves aren’t all that good to begin with? I’m not a gamer myself, and have neither seen nor played a Star Trek themed computer game since NetTrek, so I’m not at all in a position to judge the games. I just question whether the downward slide of the Trek franchise is enough of a contributor to ActiVision’s lack of sales to support a breach of contract suit. I’m sure it was one factor, but that much of a deciding factor? I’m not sure.
Discovering Deep Space Nine
First off, a confession: I’m a trekkie (trekker? whatever). Have been practically since birth, and it’s all my Dad’s fault. ;) Two years old, sitting on my dad’s lap, watching the original series on television. As soon as the Enterprise zoomed across the screen and Captain Kirk started the famous lines, “Space…where no man has gone before…” I’d be excitedly saying “speesh!” and pointing off into space (which apparently was somewhere behind me and over my left shoulder).
I grew up with Star Trek. I never did get into sewing my own uniform, or donning rubber Vulcan ears or Klingon foreheads, and I’ve only been to one convention, but I’ve got a library of original series technical manuals that I’ve picked up over the years. One of the earlier ones (the Star Trek Star Fleet Technical Manual) had an alien alphabet printed out, which I dutifully memorized, characters and pronunciation both. Imagine my surprise when I later visited Greece, and discovered that the “alien alphabet” was nothing more than Greek, and I could read every sign around me in perfect Greek. I had no idea what I was saying, of course, but I could read it all, and it’s all thanks to Star Trek.
One summer I was at one of the CTY summer camps that I participated in, and much of the talk and gossip at the time was about this new Star Trek show that was being started. Some “new generation” or something. We were all highly skeptical — after all, we’d all grown up with the Holy Trinity of Kirk, Spock and McCoy, and now someone wanted to try to recapture that? Not likely! Our skeptical opinions weren’t helped at all when one of the sunday papers printed a picture of the new crew. That kid from Stand By Me was there (a kid?). The dorky guy from that kid’s “Reading Rainbow” show was wearing a banana clip on his face. The captain…was old. And bald. To top it all off, their uniforms were one-piece jumpsuits, recalling bad memories of the horrid 70’s costuming of Star Trek: The Motion Picture — and they were hot pink! Obviously, the show was doomed from the start.
Needless to say, we were (thankfully) wrong. The kid, admittedly, suffered from some bad writing (but he’s since turned into a pretty damn cool guy). We got used to the banana clip, and it certainly helped that that “dorky guy” was also a well-respected actor in his own right. As far as old, bald captains go — if I can be half as cool (and sexy) as Patrick Stewart when I’m his age, I’ll be doing well! And, thankfully, those hot pink uniforms turned out to be nothing more than bad color in the newspaper.
Since then, while I’ve always had a soft spot in my heart for the original series, Star Trek: The Next Generation has been my favorite Star Trek incarnation (at least, as far as the TV incarnations go — the Next Gen movies rarely approached the cinematic quality of either Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan or Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country, imho).
However, towards the end of Next Gen’s run, I stopped watching TV. Less and less of what I saw on television appealed to me, and commercials were getting more and more annoying, so I just stopped. With three exceptions (the Y2K turnover, the 2000 presidential debates, and the first couple months of Enterprise), I’ve not seen any more television that what I may have wandered into while at friend’s houses. Because of this, I missed the last couple seasons of Next Gen, and have caught no more than the occasional episode of Deep Space Nine or Voyager. I watched the first few weeks of Enterprise, which seemed passable at the time, but then Paramount started releasing DVD sets of Next Gen, and I revised my opinion of Enterprise.
So throughout 2002, I revisited Captain Picard and the crew of the USS Enterprise NCC 1701-D as each successive DVD set was released. It was a lot of fun — I hadn’t seen many of the earlier episodes in years (some of them probably not since they were originally broadcast), and many of the later episodes I hadn’t seen at all. Once that was done with, though, I faced a dilemma. I knew that I enjoyed the Next Generation series enough to buy it all, but Deep Space Nine was an unknown. I’d caught a few of the episodes from time to time, and generally enjoyed what I’d seen, but I didn’t have enough experience to really make a judgment. Fan opinion on DS9 always seemed to be somewhat divided, too, with fairly equal camps lauding it and decrying it.
However, as 2002 approached and I started reading more about DS9 as the DVD release came closer, I started reading more and more people recommending it. Eventually, I decided that I’d at least pick up the first season to see what I thought of it. After all, if it bored me, I wasn’t out too much money, and I’d know not to pick up the rest.
The blood of a trekkie runs deep and true, it seems.
As it turns out, DS9 has impressed me far more than I was expecting. The series, quite simply, kicks ass. A lot of potentially dangerous decisions were made when putting the show together (not least of which was setting it on a space station, rather than a ship), but they ended up working out incredibly well. They were able to create long-lasting story lines that run not just from show to show, but from season to season, political maneuvering and machinations galore, battle scenes that have had me wide-eyed with surprise, and many other touches that have made my introduction to DS9 incredibly enjoyable.
Today, I brought home the DVD set of season four of DS9, and just finished watching the season opening episode, “The Way of the Warrior“. Wow. There’s definitely a jaw-dropping aspect to watching a fleet of thirty-some Klingon ships, from the now familiar Bird of Prey to newer battleship designs — even a few of the old standard D7 class (yes, I’m a geek, I didn’t need to look at that up) — decloaking around the station. Too freaking cool.
The more I watch of this show, the more I like it. The long lasting story arcs have been handled incredibly well so far, and after reading bits and pieces here and there about the Dominion War for years, it’s a lot of fun finally being able to see it unfold in front of me, without knowing what’s going to come up next, or which directions the various players are going to take. The character arcs have been just as strong as the story arcs, too, and Garak (the Cardassian tailor) is quickly becoming my favorite character on the show. His questionable standing and constant banter with Dr. Bashir (“But which of the stories you told us were true?” “Oh, my good doctor, they’re all true!” “Even the lies?” “Especially the lies.”) are wonderful.
At this rate, DS9 may just end up supplanting Next Gen as my favorite Star Trek series.
(Next year, of course, comes the next question. Once DS9’s DVD run is complete, Voyager will start to hit the shelves. I’ve heard far more people decry Voyager as being the downfall of the Star Trek franchise than any other previous Trek creation [except possibly Star Trek V: The Final Frontier]. So, do I cross my fingers and give the first season a shot? I’ve still got about five months to decide, though, and until then, I’ve got just under four more seasons of DS9 to work my way through.)
The spectre of Spinal Tap
We opened and closed the show, starting after a film sequence featuring a businessman searching sand dunes for a half-buried laptop, and a gravelly-voiced man saying in a so-baritone-it-must-be-important, film-trailer way, “There was a search for an internet business…”
The rest of the sequence was always lost to me as I was concentrating on standing upright and not wetting myself with laughter: Gravel Man was our signal that the revolving circular stage we were on was about to turn us briskly to face the audience and, we suspected, hurl our much ridiculed, old before his time guitarist into the front row like a ball off a dodgy roulette wheel. The spectre of Spinal Tap never leaves a rock band.
— Jesus Jones frontman Mike Edwards describing playing corporate gigs, in the Guardian Unlimited
(via kottke)
Neverland
Ooooh…I’m all sorts of excited about this: Neverland, a modern retelling of Peter Pan.
Neverland is [Damion Dietz] updated take exploring that thesis, with the Lost Boys a group of urban punks, Tinkerbell a single parent, Tiger Lilly a drag queen and Hook a sadomasochistic fury out to destroy all the beauty he envies.
…it works both as a fable and on straightforwardly realistic terms as well — and he’s not afraid to explore the darker implications of Peter’s refusal to accept adult responsibility and Captain Hook’s obsession with his own lost youth and beauty.
…Neverland seems like an appropriate way to celebrate the centenary of a book that never grows old. It opens up the book to newer dimensions, not to mention new audiences. Adults who remember the story only vaguely will be induced to pick up the book again, to check how the metaphors line up with the events in the book, to see whether they can see those pale colors when they close their eyes.
— from various reviews on the Neverland press page
(via Wil)
Enterprise designer dies
Walter “Matt” Jefferies, the designer of the original Enterprise NCC-1701, has died.
(via Matthew Ingram)
Spy Kids 3-D: Game Over
Y’know, I’m almost ashamed to admit it, but after seeing the trailer for Spy Kids 3 before Pirates of the Caribbean this weekend, I kind of want to see it. I’m certainly not expecting it to be good, but it sure looks like it could be some great campy fun.
I mean, come on — Robert Rodriguez directing; a cast that includes Antonio Banderas, Ricardo Montalban, Sly Stallone, and Salma Hayek; and to top it all off, over-the-top 3-D special effects? Even if it’s absolutely horrid, it could be a blast to see in the theater.
Guess one of these days I’m going to have to rent the first two Spy Kids movies to catch up on the story…
Sixteen Legs ;)
The first pic (that I’ve heard of, at least) of the villain in next summer’s Spider Man sequel — Doctor Octopus — hit the ‘net yesterday. Looks quite promising, from the one shot that’s up, I definitely like the design (though the arms do seem to bear a definite resemblance to the arms of the ‘squidies’ in the Matrix films).
Even better to find out, though, was that Tobey is still on board as Spidey, Sam Raimi is directing again, and Doc Ock is being played by Alfred Molina. USA Today has the details:
Alfred Molina, who has done wrong in everything from Chocolat to Dudley Do-Right, is the man bearing those malevolent arms.
“Alfred happens to be a great actor who has some of the qualities of a loved character,” says director Sam Raimi, who returns for a second spin with the web-slinging superhero reprised by Tobey Maguire and due next July 2. “Doc Ock had to have a commanding presence and intelligence,” Raimi says. “He’s got the look of a bodybuilder from 1954.”
Molina fit the bill as well as the costume, which includes dark goggles and a swept-forward hairdo.
“I’m told he’s one of the more popular villains,” says Molina, 50, who occasionally flipped through the comics as a kid. “It would have been foolish to have said no.” Originally a humanitarian, the doctor conducts an experiment that goes horribly awry and accidentally fuses a quartet of huge squid limbs to his spine.
(via Chaos Theory)
Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl
Okay, so I finally got a chance to go see Pirates of the Caribbean yesterday. When I first started hearing about it, I was pretty skeptical — a movie based on a Disney theme park ride? Interest was reawakened once I started hearing the cast list (Johnny Depp, Orlando Bloom, and Geoffrey Rush). Then, it finally came out, and was getting good reviews. Wow, did Disney manage to do something right without Pixar‘s help?
They did indeed. PotC:CotBP is an absolute blast, start to finish. From the wonderfully understated opening credits (a rarity these days — nothing but the title of the film is shown) and spooky opening sequence to set up the story, right through to the end credits, I was grinning all the way through.
One of the things I was very pleasantly surprised to find was that in contrast to the ride itself, which has been toned down over the years due (in one sequence, lusty pirates chasing nubile young women are now hungry pirates chasing women carrying plates of food), the movie didn’t flinch at all from innuendo, violence, and flat-out pirate fun. Swashbuckling swordfights, cursed treasure, cannon fire on the open seas, plunging necklines, it’s all there — and, of course, what would a pirate movie be without someone walking the plank?
The plot, while bearing little overt resemblance to the classic theme park ride, works well as a way to create an enjoyable movie while allowing the filmmakers plenty of opportunities to slip in references to memorable scenes in the original ride. Wench chasing abounds as the pirates sail in and invade the port, cannonballs flying and swords slashing, as other pirates locked in a cell vainly try to coax the keys from a pooch sitting just out of reach.
Depp’s portrayal of Cap’n Jack Sparrow was an absolute treat, as was Geoffrey Rush’s Barbossa, commanding the pirate galleon The Black Pearl itself. While I didn’t think Orlando Bloom as Will Turner particularly stood out, he definitely didn’t do a bad job, and Keira Knightley did a fine job as Elizabeth Swann (and she’s not bad eye candy, either!). I was also pleasantly surprised to see Jonathan Pryce pop up as Elizabeth’s father, Gov. Swann — I’ve enjoyed seeing him in things since I first noticed him in Brazil and Something Wicked This Way Comes.
The effects were, as far as I’m concerned, near-perfect. The cursed pirates, who appear normal unless seen in direct moonlight, when they appear as rotted skeletons, were simply amazing to see. Shots where the characters walked from shadow to moonlight and back into shadow, alternately concealing and revealing their true forms, were flawless. Even in the most trying of sequences — during a furious swordfight, running and leaping all over the screen, moving in and out of moonlight — it looked dead-on. Excellent work.
And the fights! Finally, I got a movie that addressed one of my main complaints about most modern fight sequences: that they’re too fast and cut too choppily to be of any real interest whatsoever. I never ended up grumbling to myself that I couldn’t tell what was going on during the movie, and the staging and coreography were equally impressive. Easily my favorite fight happens early in the film, as Jack Sparrow blunders into Will Turner’s smithy. Both Depp and Bloom obviously have fun with the sequence, and while there are definitely moments that defy credibility, none of them stretch it to the point of breaking. This may very well be my favorite swordfight since the fight between Inigo and The Man in Black in The Princess Bride — high praise indeed!
All in all, an absolute thrill ride of a movie. Highly recommended indeed.
Keith Richards + Pepe Le Pew = Jack Sparrow?
Okay, I have to see Pirates of the Caribbean now!
[Johnny Depp’s character Jack Sparrow] wears a red bandana and black eye makeup. His hair is beaded and he has three braids dangling from his chin. And his teeth are gold. Depp loved the idea of giving this 18th-century buccaneer a Rastafarian look. But he says the main inspiration for this character was Rolling Stones guitarist Keith Richards with a bit of everybody’s favourite cartoon skunk, Pepe Le Pew, thrown in for good measure.
“I was trying to figure the pirates of the 18th century and what it was all about. Initially you think money and all that. But I think it also had much more to do with freedom and to be out there moving forward. I sort of thought that pirates would be the rock ‘n’ roll stars of the 18th century. The greatest rock ‘n’ roll star of all time, the coolest rock ‘n’ roll star of all time, is Keith Richards — hands down. And Keith is very — I mean, you spend time with him and he’s very much a pirate.”
But when it came to conveying Jack Sparrow’s romantic nature, Depp immediately thought of Pepe Le Pew.
\”What I love about Pepe Le Pew is that this guy is absolutely convinced that he’s a great lady’s man. And he’s a skunk! You’re watching those cartoons and this guy falls deeply in love with this cat, and the cat clearly despises him.
“But Pepe Le Pew takes it that she’s playing hard to get — that she’s shy, poor thing. I loved that character’s blindness — no matter what the actual reality is, this guy sees only what he wants to see.”
Depp considers Pepe Le Pew the sort of character who was able “to run between the raindrops.” And that, he says, is how he envisaged Jack Sparrow.
(from Pirate’s Gold, via Anita)