iLife ’06: First Impressions

by

My iLife ’06 package showed up today. I can’t stay up incredibly late to play, so this is just going to be a cursory overview to begin with, but it’s a start.

  • iLife '06First things first: the package has gotten much smaller. Where iLife ’05 used a more traditional box size, the box for iLife ’06 is barely bigger (width by height) than a CD. Still about an inch or so deep.

  • iLife '06Apple’s customary flair for design on even the smallest little things shows through again. As you open the box, there are small accordion folds on the flap, and rather than being just dropped inside, the software and materials are nestled inside a small cardboard tray that slides out.

  • What you get in the box:

    • The iLife ’06 install DVD.
    • A ‘quick start’ installation guide.
    • The ubiquitous software coupons (has anyone, anywhere, at any time ever used these for anything?).
    • A ‘Welcome’ pamphlet advertising iLife add-ons (iWork, .mac, GarageBand Jam Packs).
    • A trial version of iWork ’06.

One installation was done, I poked around briefly with iPhoto and iWeb.

As noted by John Gruber, iPhoto has gained “iTunes’ theme-without-a-name”. Looks pretty slick, actually. And, while I haven’t done any stress-testing yet, it’s definitely feeling snappier than the prior version (apparently I’m not the only one seeing this, either). I like the full-screen editing mode, too — for simple edits, that’ll actually cover me without heading into Photoshop. Nicely done.

iWeb is definitely looking to be worth poking around with. It’s not restricted to .mac (yay!), though without .mac you don’t have the one-click-publishing option — rather, you ‘publish’ to a local folder, and then you can either serve directly from there (if your Mac is a webserver), or you can upload the generated files to a remote server. The markup isn’t terribly pretty, but that’s not a big surprise. Feel free to check out the one sample page I’ve made so far to see what you think (though that is just a single page, and I haven’t delved into multi-page sites, blog publishing, or much of anything else). On the bright side, there was only one error preventing the page from validating…on the down side, that’s in part because the generated page is all images and link maps. Hmmm. Definitely reserving judgement on this one until I get a chance to play more.

That’s all I can do for tonight, though — it’s after midnight, and I’ve got class at 10am tomorrow morning. I’ll play more as soon as I can grab a few hours…

iTunes “Club 69 Future Mix Vol. 1 (full mix)” by Various Artists from the album Club 69 Future Mix Vol. 1 (full mix) (1998, 1:14:02).

Help: .htaccess redirects

by

Never having quite gotten the hang of .htaccess redirect requests, I’m hoping someone out there might be able to give me a hand with this.

I would like this…

https://michaelhans.com/eclecticism/tags/pickatag

…to map to this (though not wrapped onto multiple lines, obviously)…

http://www.michaelhanscom.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tags.cgi?
blog_id=1&tags=pickatag

Similarly, for multiple tags, this…

https://michaelhans.com/eclecticism/tags/pickatag+anytag

…should map to this (and so on, as more tags are added)…

http://www.michaelhanscom.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tags.cgi?
blog_id=1&tags=pickatag+anytag

Any ideas? Thanks much in advance!

iTunes “Mexican Women” by Throwing Muses from the album Just Say Yo (1988, 2:49).

iTunes MiniStore

by

Along with the Mac OS X 10.4.4 update that was released today, Software Update notified me of two other updates to install: QuickTime 7.0.4 and iTunes 6.0.2 (which doesn’t seem to have a support document listing the updates made to the program).

Apparently, one of the changes made to iTunes was more advertising! Yay! I was just lamenting the fact that I didn’t see enough ads while deciding which song to play next, and here Apple’s gone and taken care of that for me.

iTunes MiniStore

Thankfully, there’s a new little button added to the group at the lower-right that allows you to toggle the MiniStore on and off, so I can kill this little monstrosity. Still doesn’t make its inclusion any less obnoxious, though.

iTunes “Jerry Springer” by Yankovic, “Weird Al” from the album Running With Scissors (1999, 2:46).

Apple Intel Ad Music: Moby

by

The music in Apple’s clever Intel processor ad sounded really familiar, and after running it around in my head for a bit, I figured it out.

It’s Moby‘s ‘God Moving Over the Face of the Waters‘, which I have on the soundtrack to Heat (which, incidentally, is one of my favorite soundtrack albums, and a really good movie to boot).

Just in case anyone else is curious.

iTunes “God Moving Over the Face of the Waters” by Moby from the album Heat (1995, 6:58).

Seattle Pillow Fight

by

I’ll do my best to avoid any snarky “my god MySpace drives me up the wall” comments (heh…oops) to pass on this tidbit I just found:

Seattle Pillow Fight

So here’s the deal… SEATTLE PILLOW FIGHT is going to be a Guinness World Record breaking event held right here in Seattle THIS SPRING IN 2006! It’s going to be a great way to bring the excitement of a world record home to the Seattle community. Pillow fights have been sweeping communities and college campuses recently, each time setting the bar higher and higher (or not, as some efforts haven’t quite made the mark!) DOES SEATTLE HAVE THE SPIRIT AND THE PRIDE THAT IT TAKES TO SHOW EVERYONE WHAT IT MEANS TO COME TOGETHER AS A COMMUNITY AND CRUSH A WORLD RECORD? You bet it does! Let’s see who will stand behind this charitable effort between now and the “to be determined” date in May of 2006!

No definite day yet, but this should be worth paying attention to.

(via seattle)

iTunes “Get Up! Go Insane! (Fatboy Really Lost It)” by Strech ‘n’ Vern from the album Fatboy Slim’s Greatest Remixes (2000, 7:14).

It’s Illegal to be Annoying

by

Update: Apparently, the article I’m quoting is somewhat misleading. According to a lawyer’s comment on BoingBoing:

Declan’s article is misleading. The provision extends a telephone harassment law to apply to email. Declan describes the provision as applying whenever a person “annoys” another: “A new federal law states that when you annoy someone on the Internet, you must disclose your identity.”

But that’s not what the law says. Instead it provides: “Whoever…utilizes any device or software that can be used to originate telecommunications or other types of communications that are transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet… without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person…who receives the communications…shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.”

Note that “annoy” is part of the intent element of the statute — it requires the intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass. Far from an anti-anonymity provision that applies whenever a person annoys another, it is merely a prohibition on harassment.

Thanks, Don! This kind of thing happens when I’m a bit behind…

No, I’m not kidding. Annoying someone via the Internet is now a federal crime.

It’s no joke. Last Thursday, President Bush signed into law a prohibition on posting annoying Web messages or sending annoying e-mail messages without disclosing your true identity.

In other words, it’s OK to flame someone on a mailing list or in a blog as long as you do it under your real name. Thank Congress for small favors, I guess.

This ridiculous prohibition, which would likely imperil much of Usenet, is buried in the so-called Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act. Criminal penalties include stiff fines and two years in prison.

[…] Buried deep in the new law is Sec. 113, an innocuously titled bit called “Preventing Cyberstalking.” It rewrites existing telephone harassment law to prohibit anyone from using the Internet “without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy.”

To grease the rails for this idea, Sen. Arlen Specter, a Pennsylvania Republican, and the section’s other sponsors slipped it into an unrelated, must-pass bill to fund the Department of Justice. The plan: to make it politically infeasible for politicians to oppose the measure.

The tactic worked. The bill cleared the House of Representatives by voice vote, and the Senate unanimously approved it Dec. 16.

Once again, something which, admittedly, likely started from good intentions — preventing cyberstalking — has been dumbed down to the point of ludicrousness by politicians too stupid to think about the real legal ramifications of the laws they’re enacting.

On the bright side, maybe we can use this law to get the freepers booted off the ‘net? ;)

(via [seattle's info]seattle)

iTunes “Relax (AK1200)” by Keoki from the album Jealousy (2001, 6:46).

Andy Rosen: Early punk photos

by

Jim Kerr, Simple MindsI came across an article in today’s Seattle Times about Andy Rosen, who’d taken a lot of photographs of the early punk scene in London — and is just now starting to showcase a lot of never before seen photos on Flickr.

Rosen had a successful photography career from 1976 to 1984, completely embedding himself in the early punk-rock scene in London.

He began as the bands were starting up, and by the time the punk-rock scene exploded, he had a real in. He lived with some of the musicians and was friends with some people who became musicians.

But back then you needed money and more than a card reader to see your shots, so a lot of Rosen’s film never got processed. It got boxed up and stored at mum and dad’s. That includes all the photos he finally uncovered and developed last year, and sat on until now.

Dave Gahan, Depeche ModeThe collection he’s put up so far (and, apparently, he’s just getting started), is amazing. Simple Minds, Depeche Mode, Bauhaus, Siouxie Sioux, The Sex Pistols…tons of shots that have never been published before.

On top of that, he’s set up a weblog where he’s recounting some of the stories behind the photos — the photo shoots themselves, his relationships to the subjects, how he was able to get the shots he did. Tons of incredible documentation of the time and the musicians.

For instance, a very early performance by The Clash at a small Boxing Day 1979 gathering with about fifty family and friends in attendance:

Joe Strummer, The ClashAt the time the Clash were just another punk band – better than most but definately not the Rock Stars they were to become. Funny thing was I shot about 10 rolls of black and white and decided not to develop them. Money was tight in those days – so I would sometimes just not bother processing the film if I felt the band was not worthy of the expense. Looking back on it what an idiot I was. Years (two decades) later I stumbled on a whole bag of unprocesed film I had left In london at my mum and dads. There they were clearly labaled THE CLASH. I excitedly processed them and to my amazment I relaized I had captured a precious moment in Rock And Roll history – which might never have been seen. A band in all their innocent glory – playing to fifty people – moments before they were to etch themselves into punk history as one of the most prolific Punk Bands ever.

This is great, great stuff. Thanks for sharing all this, Andy!