Nickels, Sims: Quit yappin’ and start doin’!

When I wrote out the list of cities supporting equal marriage rights last week, it was a little disappointing to not have Seattle in that list, too. Living in the area of Seattle I do (lower First Hill, within easy walking distance of Broadway/Capitol Hill), walking by the clubs I pass on the weekends on the way to the Vogue (R Place, Neighbors, the Wild Rose), and having been out at the Gay Pride festivities for the past few years, it always seemed to me that Seattle would be a natural for supporting this kind of movement.

And apparently, it could be…if only the local politicians would grow a spine, stop dilly-dallying, and actually do something.

When it comes to gay marriage, the difference between Seattle and San Francisco is the unwillingness of politicians here to push the issue. Although they would like you to believe otherwise, there is nothing stopping Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels and King County Executive Ron Sims from teaming up to make a San Francisco-style stand in favor of same-sex marriage rights.

[…]

Now is the perfect time for such a suit. Here’s why: Opponents of gay marriage would freak out, fearing a Washington ruling similar to the recent decision in Massachusetts ordering same-sex marriages to begin May 17. And their freakout would be well founded. The equal-protection and equal-rights language in Washington’s constitution is so strong, observers believe the state’s highest court would rule in favor of same-sex marriage. To head that scenario off at the pass, gay-marriage opponents would try to go above the heads of the Washington State Supreme Court justices by trying to amend the state constitution to prohibit gay marriage. But the amendment process begins in the state legislature, and the legislature is about to close up shop for the year, so the soonest anti-marriage forces could introduce their amendment would likely be 2005–which would give the courts enough time to rule on the Seattle/King County case, and gay-rights supporters enough time to rally the one-third of state senators or state reps that is needed to kill a proposed amendment.

[…]

Both Nickels and Sims do seem rather oblivious to the tipping point the gay civil rights movement in this country has reached. Political leaders in other urban centers with large numbers of gay people get it, and they are pushing hard in the right direction. (Witness Chicago Mayor Richard Daley, speaking last week in support of gay marriage: “Marriage has been undermined by divorce, so don’t tell me about marriage. Don’t blame the gay and lesbian, transgender, and transsexual community. [They are] your doctors, your lawyers, your journalists. They are politicians. They have adopted children. To me, we have to understand that this is part and parcel of our families and extended families.”) When you consider that Seattle’s King County has a higher concentration of cohabitating gay and lesbian couples than Chicago’s Cook County, the fact that Nickels and Sims aren’t making a more forceful push for the marriage rights of gays and lesbians here becomes, quite simply, embarrassing.

It’s a shame that our elected representatives aren’t taking the initiative and using this opportunity to actually promote equal rights for everyone rather than just paying lip service to it.

iTunes: “Somebody Has to Pay” by van der Meer, Susie from the album Run Lola Run (1998, 3:25).

Violence is ( bad | good ) !

Interesting ruminations from Alan today…

Group One blames violence in video games and movies for the behavior of today’s youth.

Group Two buys out entire theaters for church groups, youth groups and families to see Mel Gibson’s “The Passion”.

Any bets on just how separate those two groups really are?

I’m guessing that while there are definitely people solidly in one camp or another, there are probably quite a few people in both groups (and I’ll be damned if I can remember the name of that kind of diagram — you know, the two overlapping circles…) that see absolutely no conflict between the two positions. How they would manage that, I’m not sure, but I wouldn’t be at all surprised.

iTunes: “Mission Accomplished” by DJ Wüdi from the album Difficult Listening Hour (2001, 27:41).

An insider’s view of MS Word 6.0

Microsoft Word for the Mac versions 4 and 5 were my introductions to Word, and in the opinion of myself and many other people, were the pinnacle of Microsoft’s Mac programming.

I had a single 1.4Mb floppy disc on my first Mac (a Mac Classic) that had the MS Word program and every paper I wrote for school that year, and it ran quite happily in the 1Mb of RAM that my lil’ Classic had in it. Word 5, while not that small, was the perfect combination of features and usability, adding useful functions without becoming too much of a memory, space, or speed hog.

Then came Word 6.

Huge. Bloated. A memory hog. Dog-slow. And a truly hideous interface that only a Windows user could love (or even feel at home in).

Things have improved since then, thankfully — Word (and Office) for Mac OS X is actually useable, though I tend not to bother unless I have a really pressing need (such as getting into old archived documents laying around on my system), as the majority of my writing these days is either coding my site in BBEdit or posting via Ecto.

Still, it was quite interesting to find this look at the creation of MS Word 6 from Rick Schaut, one of the people on the team for Word 6.

Shipping a crappy product is a lot like beating your head against the wall.  It really does feel good when you ship a great product as a follow-up, and it really does motivate you to spend some time trying to figure out how not to ship a crappy product again.

Mac Word 6.0 was a crappy product.  And, we spent some time trying to figure out how not to do that again.  In the process, we learned a few things, not the least of which was the meaning of the term “Mac-like.”

(via Scoble)

iTunes: “Homey Don’t Play Dat” by Bonnie ‘n’ Clyde from the album Terminator X and the Valley of the Jeep Beats (1991, 4:12).

The Passion

The more I read about Mel Gibson’s “The Passion“, the less interested I am in seeing two hours of one man being brutally tortured to death.

However, I did love Satapher’s take on the controversy in a MeFi thread…

Wasn’t it the destiny of Jesus to die for the sins of the world? so that we might be saved?

Shouldnt this movie spark pro-semitism!? Someody had to kill the bastard — somebody had to save your soul! THANK GOD THE JEWS KILLED JESUS AND SAVED OUR SOULS.

GOD DAMN.

Okay, maybe it’s a bit wrong. But it’s really funny.

To me.

iTunes: “Wreath of Barbs (Neuroticfish 2)” by :Wumpscut: from the album Wreath of Barbs (Disc 1 – Classic Remixes) (2002, 5:11).

Irony, copyright, and site design

First, read what this gentleman has to say about the appropriation of content from other weblogs:

I was reading Dawnkeyotie’s blog and she links to the story of Tequila Mockingbird and how some young punk wannbe blogger has been stealing her material.

Now I’ll admit to being influenced by other sites, like my About This Site page borrows rather heavily from the About page at Ani Moller’s site, but stealing word for word… Just not cool.

Etiquette is the name of the game… If you want to use text, at least give proper credit, or a trackback if possible.

If you want to steal my life, go ahead, I dare you… I Double Dog Dare You™ Mofo! I may not display a copyright notice, but it’s in the source of every page on this site.

Now, with that firmly in mind, head on over and check out his site design.

Look familiar? It looks awfully familiar to me. Funny, there’s no credit given, and he’s replaced the copyright notice in my code with one of his own, implying that the design work is his.

According to his about page, the last major redesign to his site went live on Monday, Feb. 2nd of 2004. Checking his archives, here’s what we find for the redesign announcement

You like?

I though I’d lost this new look, but luckily a few files were still on my server so for the last 12 hours I went through everything with the virtual equivalent of a fine tooth comb and cleaned it all up and finally finished what I started some 2 weeks ago.

I think it’s much nicer, but then anything is much nicer than the old b2 default template, so it makes this place my own at last.

Before you ask, yes, it looks a bit unaligned in Internet Explorer, but it looks great in Mozilla Firebird and seeing as that’s the browser I use mostly, get used to it. If I can find a way to realign in IE I will, but until then it’s just cosmetic differences.

Yes — he definitely made this place his own — as long as “his own” is rather loosely defined as “blatantly stolen from someone else”.

Sigh.

The really ridiculous thing about this, though, is that I actually do like the way my design translates to a two-column layout. Considering I occasionally toy with the idea of going back to a two-column design rather than this single-column design, if I used the same base overall look, I’d end up looking nearly exactly how he does now. Would I then have to turn around and give him credit for inspiring some of the design?

Again — oh, the irony.

(Many thanks to Firas for the tip-off.)

Update: All’s well that ends well.

I’ve got a fan!

In January of 2003, I put up a post pointing out Jakob Nielsen’s ‘Top ten web design mistakes’. Though his advice is generally aimed more at commercial sites than personal sites, many of the concepts will cary over from one to the other, so I used the list to evaluate my own site and see how I was doing.

That March, a visitor by the name of ‘Deakster‘ [Deakster’s site may come up with a ‘403 forbidden’ error if you attempt clicking on his link, as I think he may be denying any visitors referred by my website.] came by the page and left a mildly snide comment about Nielsen and his company. Not in itself a big deal, but when I visited the URL left by Deakster, I found that his own site was coded in such a way as to require Internet Explorer, and would not load for me using Safari on my Mac or Mozilla on my PC. I mentioned this in a reply comment, that was that, and I didn’t think any more of it.

Last week, almost a year since he left his original comment, Deakster came back. This time, apparently incensed by my reply to his first comment, he took it upon himself to critique myself and one of my sites (specifically, what little is left at djwudi.com) in two comments left back-to-back.

Needless to say, I was a little amused by this (not just that he attempted to take me to task, and that he did so quite poorly, but mostly that he came back nearly a full year after his last and only previous comment to my site), and responded in turn. Again, Deakster wasn’t thrilled, started to leave more comments, but soon requested that I remove all of his comments from the page, declaring that he “no longer wanted to be associated with the site.”

Unfortunately, I wasn’t actually at my computer when his request first came through, so twenty minutes later he made the same request again.

It wasn’t long after that that I did get the message, however, and while I didn’t remove the comment placeholders from the page (I saw no reason to remove my comments, and as they were replies to his, I didn’t like the idea of out-and-out deleting his comments and ‘orphaning’ mine). I did, however, remove the text of his comments, indicating that I had done so at his request.

Apparently that wasn’t good enough.

I now have 75 bogus trackback pings on that post, courtesy of my new friend, with messages such as “Michael is a first class prick and should keep his mouth shut,” “Take on a haxor an end up with an app that autopost shit to yer crap site,” “Your blog aint sexy and neither is your bald spot,” “Why are yanks such fools — cause they are all like Michael,” and his final ultimatum, “Had enough Michael — i will leave it if you delete everything I want deleting and I mean everything.”

Why, I do believe I’m being harassed, ladies and gentlemen.

All of Deakster’s comments over the past few days and every one of the bogus TrackBack pings has come from IP address 81.152.149.121. Unfortunately, while I could ban that IP address from commenting, I don’t believe that there is currently a way to ban TrackBack pings by IP.

So what now?

Obviously, I certainly could “delete-everything-i-want-deleting-and-i-mean-everything” all of Deakster’s comments (and TrackBack pings) easily enough, but something tells me that he’ll likely not be satisfied until I also expunge my reply (which contains quotes from his comments) also, which I’m in no great hurry to do (hey, I had fun responding to his attacks…). Besides, giving in to script kiddies (a category I wouldn’t have put Deakster in until I got the TrackBack ping flood) isn’t my idea of a good time. ;)

Biosphere

There’s an interesting article from the Philadelphia Inquirer looking at the early-90’s Biosphere experiment. I remember being fascinated by this at the time it was going on, but thought I remembered that it eventually fell apart. Apparently I was wrong — the experiment did last the full two years planned, though not without problems…

Living inside the glass enclosure known as Biosphere 2 for two years wasn’t easy. If its eight pioneering residents wanted pizza, they had to grow their own wheat and milk a goat for cheese. They contended with thinning air, insufficient food, constant work and, worst of all, each other.

Things like this might be more and more important as we look more seriously at exploring the universe outside of our little planet. It’s neat to see people looking back on this again, and nice to be able to get a little more information on how things actually went during those two years.

(via The Mediaburn Radio Weblog)

Grey Tuesday followup

Downhill Battle has posted a followup to yesterday’s ‘Grey Tuesday’ event:

GREY TUESDAY EXCEEDED everyone’s expectations. When we put the word out about this protest, we had no idea how many sites would join in (over 400 did). When EMI’s lawyers sent threatening letters on Monday afternoon to people who were planning to host the album, we had no idea how many would risk getting sued to make this important political stand (over 170 did). We didn’t know we’d get messages of solidarity from prominent political and intellectual forces like the EFF and Lawrence Lessig, but we did (and thanks). All of us who took part in this protest have done a lot to spur a rethinking of copyright law in terms of what’s good for musicians and what’s good for our music culture. And we’ve made it more apparent than ever how the major record labels have twisted the original purpose of copyright law (“to promote the progress of science and the useful arts”) in order to suppress music that doesn’t flow from their system.

They have links at the bottom of their post to some of the stories about Grey Tuesday that showed up in the media, including one fron the New York Times.

iTunes: “Electricity” by Apoptygma Berzerk (5:08).

May 7th is No Pants Day

I don’t think I’ll be able to get away with it at work, but afterwards… :-D

You Should Wear Nothing!

NOTHING?!?!?! There are no limits or boundaries for you. No pants, no clothes, whatever. But, hey, if you’re going to get arrested, this is definitely the way to go.

Find out which No Pants Day outfit YOU should wear!

No Pants Day is May 7th, 2004. To find out more about No Pants Day, visit
www.NoPantsDay.com

(via Dad)

iTunes: “Schiff Ahoi” by Totenmond from the album Cold Hands Seduction IV (3:55).

Grey Tuesday

It’s Grey Tuesday

It’s time for music fans to stand up and demand change from the music industry’s copyright cartel.

Tuesday, February 24 will be a day of coordinated civil disobedience: websites will post Danger Mouse’s Grey Album on their site for 24 hours in protest of EMI’s attempts to censor this work.

DJ Danger Mouse created a remix of Jay-Z’s the Black Album and the Beatles White Album, and called it the Grey Album. Jay-Z’s record label, Roc-A-Fella, released an a capella version of his Black Album specifically to encourage remixes like this one. But despite praise from music fans and major media outlets like Rolling Stone (“an ingenious hip-hop record that sounds oddly ahead of its time”) and the Boston Globe (which called it the “most creatively captivating” album of the year), EMI has sent cease and desist letters demanding that stores destroy their copies of the album and websites remove them from their site. EMI claims copyright control of the Beatles 1968 White Album.

Danger Mouse’s album is one of the most “respectful” and undeniably positive examples of sampling; it honors both the Beatles and Jay-Z. Yet the lawyers and bureaucrats at EMI have shown zero flexibility and not a glimmer of interest in the artistic significance of this work. And without a clearly defined right to sample (e.g. compulsory licensing), the five major record labels will continue to use copyright in a reactionary and narrowly self-interested manner that limits and erodes creativity. Their actions are also self-defeating: good new music is being created that people want to buy, but the major labels are so obsessed with hoarding their copyrights that they are literally turning customers away.

This first-of-its-kind protest signals a refusal to let major label lawyers control what musicians can create and what the public can hear. The Grey Album is only one of the thousands of legitimate and valuable efforts that have been stifled by the record industry– not to mention the ones that were never even attempted because of the current legal climate. We cannot allow these corporations to continue censoring art; we need common-sense reforms to copyright law that can make sampling legal and practical for artists.

The Grey Tuesday protest is being organized by Downhill Battle, a music activism project that has no affiliation with Danger Mouse.

And on that note…

Update:

Much as I’d like to continue this, I just joined the many people who have been sent “Cease and Desist” letters. I debated leaving the links up, but should the lawyers decide to follow through, there’s no way I’d be able to put up a fight (not that I’d have any money to give them anyway, but it’d be more hassle than I want to deal with). I’m sure that many other sites will continue to offer the Grey Album over the course of the day, and possibly beyond, and I wish them the best of luck.

This time, though, I’d rather record that I made my statement of support and participated until receiving the Cease and Desist — at which time, for my own protection and peace of mind, I did just that.

The letter I received follows (though it’s the same letter that other sites were getting yesterday)…

From: JCJ\@cll.com
Subject: The Grey Album and Misappropriation of Capital Records, Inc.’s Sound Recordings
Date: February 24, 2004 9:50:43 PST
To: djwudi\@myrealbox.com

Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C.
LAW OFFICES
1133 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036-6799
Telephone (212) 790-9200
Web www.cll.com
Fax (212) 575-0671

Re: The Grey Album and Misappropriation of Capitol Records, Inc.’s Sound Recordings

To Whom It May Concern:

We are counsel to Capitol Records, Inc. (“Capitol”), the exclusive U.S. licensee and/or owner and distributor of musical sound recordings featuring performances by The Beatles. We write concerning your announced intention of distributing an unlawful and unauthorized sound recording known as The Grey Album on February 24, 2004. This infringing album contains extensive samples from recorded performances by the Beatles, including “Long, Long, Long,” “While My Guitar Gently Weeps,” “Glass Onion,” “Savoy Truffle,” “Mother Nature’s Son,” “Helter Skelter,” “Julia,” “Happiness is Warm Gun,” “Piggies,” “Dear Prudence,” “Rocky Raccoon,” “Revolution 1,” “Revolution 9,” “I’m So Tired,” and “Cry Baby Cry” (the “Capitol Recordings”). Distribution of The Grey Album constitutes a serious violation of Capitol’s rights in the Capitol Recordings as well as the valuable intellectual property rights of other artists, music publishers, and/or record companies and will subject you to serious legal remedies for willful violation of the laws. We accordingly demand that you cease any plans or efforts to distribute or publicly perform this unlawful recording.

As you are no doubt aware, The Grey Album is an amalgamation created by an individual named Brian Burton (a/k/a Danger Mouse) of Jay-Z’s The Black Album and the Beatles’ self-titled 1968 album commonly known as The White Album. There is no dispute that The Grey Album incorporates Capitol Recordings, as Mr. Burton acknowledges on his website (http://www.djdangermouse.com) that “every kick, snare, and chord is taken from the Beatles White Album and is in their original recording somwhere [sic].” There is also no dispute that Mr. Burton never requested permission from any of the rights-holders to create The Grey Album.

Capitol has demanded that Mr. Burton cease distribution of The Grey Album, and Mr. Burton has indicated publicly that he intends to comply with Capitol’s demands. As reported by Reuters on February 17, 2004:

Danger Mouse said he created the record strictly as a limited-edition promotional item, with only a few thousand copies pressed . . . .

The artist, whose real name is Brian Burton, has agreed to comply with the order and will no longer distribute copies. “He just wanted people to hear the record,” says a spokesman in the U.K.

Reuters has also quoted Mr. Burton as saying, “[t]his wasn’t supposed to happen . . . . I just sent out a few tracks (and) now online stores are selling it and people are downloading it all over the place.” By further distributing The Grey Album, you will not only be violating the rights of those who own the recordings and compositions at issue. You will also be interfering with the intention of the very artist whose rights you purport to vindicate.

We are aware of the so-called “Grey Tuesday” event, sponsored by http://www.downhillbattle.org and described on the http://www.greytuesday.org website as a “day of coordinated civil disobedience” in which participating sites will make the unlawful Grey Album available for downloading, distribution, and file-sharing in order to force “reforms to copyright law that can make sampling legal.” Your site is listed among those that will engage in this openly unlawful conduct. Any unauthorized distribution, reproduction, public performance, and/or other exploitation of The Grey Album will constitute, among other things, common law copyright infringement/misappropriation, unfair competition, and unjust enrichment rendering you and anyone engaged with you in such acts liable for all of the remedies provided by relevant laws. These remedies include but are not limited to preliminary and permanent injunctive relief as well as monetary and punitive damages necessary to remedy your openly willful violation of Capitol’s rights.

We accordingly demand you:

  1. cease and desist from the actual or intended distribution, reproduction, public performance or other exploitation of The Grey Album and any other unauthorized uses of the Capitol Recordings or any other sound recordings owned and/or controlled by Capitol;
  2. identify the names and addresses of any third parties who have supplied you with physical or digital copies of The Grey Album or who are otherwise involved in The Grey Album‘s unauthorized distribution, reproduction, public performance, or other exploitation;
  3. provide Capitol with an accounting of all units of The Grey Album that have been distributed via your website, either physically or digitally, and of all instances of public performance of The Grey Album rendered via your website; and
  4. preserve any and all documents and records relating to this matter, including but not limited to electronic data and other information which may be relevant/discoverable in the event of litigation.

In addition, to the extent that you have already commenced distribution of The Grey Album, you must make payment to Capitol in an amount to be discussed. We demand that you contact us immediately.

Unless we receive full and immediate compliance with these demands, Capitol will be forced to consider pursuing any and all available remedies at law and in equity.

Nothing herein shall be deemed an admission or waiver of any rights or remedies of Capitol and/or its affiliates, all of which are hereby expressly reserved.

Sincerely,

/s/ J. Christopher Jensen

J. Christopher Jensen
Telephone (direct dial): (212) 790-9204
Email: JCJ\@cll.com

Note that this is a boilerplate letter that has been sent out to many (if not all) sites participating in Grey Tuesday (to the point that to post it here, I had to edit out glitches that had popped up during many forwards and re-sends that the legal counsel had not bothered to clean out of the text of the e-mail).

Item one of the demands has been complied with.

Items two through four I have no intention of complying with, and according to Downhill Battle’s lawyers can be ignored.

Lawyers have advised us that we can ignore your demands number 2, 3, and 4 that are listed at the bottom of your letter. EMI has no legal right to make these demands and we will not comply with them.

Good luck to all the other participants.

And lastly, with thanks to adam b. and The Beatles:

have you seen the little piggies
crawling in the dirt?
and for all the little piggies
life is getting worse
always having dirt
to play around in

have you seen the bigger piggies
in their starched white shirts?
you will find the bigger piggies
stirring up the dirt
they always have clean shirts
to play around in

in their sties with all their backing
they don’t care what goes on around

in their eyes, there’s something lacking
what they need’s a damn good whacking

— The Beatles, “Piggies”, from The White Album

iTunes: “Hass” by Das Ich from the album Relikt (Disc 1) (2003, 7:09).