Occam’s Razor

So — what’s more likely?

That while trying to install and figure out the image-processing software that came with their new digital camera, a husband and wife accidentally opened the husbands previously hidden stash of downloaded porn, or…

That after purchasing a brand-new digital camera, taking a few pictures, and plugging it into their computer, a husband and wife discovered that there were a number of pornographic images already on the camera when they bought it?

An investigation has begun after a couple found pornographic pictures on a new digital camera they had bought.

Jackie and Eammon Gall, from Greater Manchester, discovered the explicit shots in the memory of the camera soon after they bought it for £400 at Argos.

[…]

[Mr. Gall] told BBC GMR: \”When we discovered the pictures, I was trying to get rid of them straight away, because that was my instant reaction.

\”Then for whatever reason the pictures then became part of the desktop and filled up the whole screen.

“Then I started to panic, thinking the pictures would perhaps go anywhere else on the computer that they shouldn’t.”

I know you’re not supposed to snicker at people. But come on…

(via Need to Know)

iTunes: “Child In Us, The” by Enigma from the album Le Roi Est Mort, Vive Le Roi! (1996, 5:06).

Fish heads, fish heads, roly poly fish heads…

There’s a (mostly) amusing article in the Seattle PI today about the “War of the Fish” — that is, the “Jesus Fish” and the many variations plastered over cars all over the place.

Brothers and sisters, there’s a battle raging. It’s not a battle fought with weapons of mass destruction, Lord save us, and it’s not a battle fought in armored personnel carriers.

It is a battle, children, for the hearts — yea, verily, for the everlasting souls — of America’s trunks and bumpers. It is a battle of words and wills, and fish. Lots and lots of fish.

Hallelujah! Can I get a witness?

Amen, brother.

Personally, I’m fairly partial to this one…

Whatever Fish

…though there are certainly a lot to choose from.

One thing about the article did really bug me, though.

Farmer, the Ashland fish maker, said the only word fish booksellers in his area wouldn’t carry was Tolerance.

Some fish, friends, are just too hard to swallow.

The only one they won’t sell. They’re quite happy to sell as many other this believe vs. that belief slogans as they can, but heaven forbid they actually suggest that we actually try to get along with each other! We just can’t have that, now can we?

(sigh)

iTunes: “I Sit On Acid (’95)” by Lords of Acid from the album Do What You Wanna Do (1995, 4:31).

Photoshop CS won’t do money

Adobe Photoshop CS apparently has special image-recognition code built in that will detect someone attempting to work with scanned currency, and then refuse to work with the image (“login as guest” to read the thread). Instead, it pops up an error message, and directs the user to the Rules for Use website.

We received a TIFF image from a customer, of a \$20 bill. The image does not violate any laws regarding reproduction of currency (it’s not even close to actual-size, and it’s not a “flat” portrayal – it’s wavy, as if it’s fluttering in the wind. Nor is it real-color.

However, Photoshop CS refuses to open the image, and provides an error message regarding the (il)legality of currency reproduction and an “information” button that takes you to the web. (Photoshop 7, of course, has no such qualms).

What the hell is this? In my book this is completely unacceptable – Photoshop is an image editor, not a censor, government policy enforcer or anything else.

Adobe, you’ve got some explaining to do.

Further testing by users has determined that the limitation affects the new US \$20 bill and several European bills, probably through as series of image-recognition algorithms (that, incidentally, must be applied to every image brought into Photoshop), at least one of which is probably the “EURion Constellation” method. Adobe has yet to comment on the issue.

Most likely, though, this was done at the request/strong encouragement of the government in an attempt to prevent counterfeiting of currency. The problem is, while the intent may be noble, this is enforcement at entirely the wrong end of the process. There are many, many legal uses for altered versions of the images on currency (advertising, promotional or informational purposes, parodies, and so on), all of which are covered by the fair uses clauses detailed on the very site where Adobe directs the user.

The Counterfeit Detection Act of 1992, Public Law 102-550, in Section 411 of Title 31 of the Code of Federal Regulations, permits color illustrations of U.S. currency provided:

  1. the illustration is of a size less than three-fourths or more than one and one-half, in linear dimension, of each part of the item illustrated;
  2. the illustration is one-sided; and
  3. all negatives, plates, positives, digitized storage medium, graphic files, magnetic medium, optical storage devices, and any other thing used in the making of the illustration that contain an image of the illustration or any part thereof are destroyed and/or deleted or erased after their final use.

Adobe have taken entirely the wrong step with this approach. In an effort to crack down on counterfeiters, they have summarily denied any and all users of their software the ability to perform legal operations on images of currency — and in cases such as that detailed by in the post that started the thread in Adobe’s forums, this can and will cause problems for those people who have a real and legitimate business need to work with such images.

(via /.)

[Update:]{.underline}

A response, of sorts, from Adobe.

Zeugma

Cool word of the day: zeugma.

Zeugma is a word for when you make a verb do several functions at the same time (eg. “I left in a foul mood and a black taxi”). Flanders and Swann’s song “Have Some Madeira M’Dear” employes quadruple zeugma in each verse, which is dead impressive; the relevant lines are:

And he said as he hastened to put out the cat,
The wine, his cigar and the lamps

She lowered her standards by raising her glass,
Her courage, her eyes and his hopes.

When he asked, “What in Heaven?” She made no reply,
Up her mind, and a dash for the door.

I love things like this.

2003 Pictures of the Year

©2003 Alan Berner

The Seattle Times’ Pacific Northwest magazine has released their 2003 Pictures of the Year special issue, and all the shots have been posted on their website.

While some of the photos merely state the subject and what is happening, several include the thoughts of the photographers regarding the subject matter, how the photo was taken, and other such things. One of the things I enjoyed reading was how often these professional photographers deemed their shots “total luck” — it makes me feel better about my ratio of good shots to pure dreck. ;)

(via Spiel)

Top Word Lists of 2003

Top 10 Words of 2003:\
embedded\
blog\
SARS\
spam\
taikonaut\
Bushism\
allision\
recall\
Middangeard\
celibacy YourDictionary.com has released their Top Word Lists of 2003: the Top Ten Words of 2003, Top Ten Personal Names of 2003, Top Ten Youthspeak Words, Bonus Youthspeak Phenomenon of Note, Top Phrases of 2003, 5 Top Mispronunciations by President Bush in 2003, Best New Product Names, Worst New Product Names, Top Enron Inspired Words, Top Internet Words Moving into Widespread Use, Top Sports-related Words, and Top Word Trends in Pop Music Names.

Most of the words and terms in the lists I’d heard before, though there were a few exceptions (Poolife?). I thought this bit at the very end was especially cool, though…

Most frequently spoken word on the Planet:

1. OK Still the most popular word in languages around the world. “OK” originated in a joke in the 1830’s, spelled “oll korrekt” in Boston newspapers, the joke being, both words were incorrect. It became so popular, that it was soon abbreviated to simply “O. K.” Despite its popularity, the word would have fallen by the wayside had not Martin van Buren, called “Old Kinderhook” for being born in Kinderhook, N.Y. used it in his presidential reelection campaign of 1840. So don’t “misunderestimate” the impact of presidential usage on the growth of our vocabulary. It is also spelled “okay.”

(via Scoble)

Bonus list: In the comments to Scoble’s post, Raymond Chen pointed out Merriam-Webster’s top 10 words of 2003, as determined by how frequently they were looked up on the online dictionary:

  1. democracy
  2. quagmire
  3. quarantine
  4. matrix
  5. marriage
  6. slog
  7. gubernatorial
  8. plagiarism
  9. outage
  10. batten

Got it, got it, need it, got it, not a chance, need it, got it…

While I’m still partial to the “Old School” purity tests, Kirsten pointed out a page that bills itself as the ‘ultimate’ purity test, and I had to give it a shot…

Your Ultimate Purity Score Is…
Category Your Score Average
Self-Lovin’ 21.7%
I wouldn’t shake hands, if I were you
65%
Shamelessness 57.1%
It takes a couple of drinks
79.4%
Sex Drive 15.8%
Humps fire hydrants when nobody’s looking
77.7%
Straightness 1.8%
Knows the other body type like a map
44.9%
Gayness 58.9%
Had that experience at camp
83.4%
Fucking Sick 70.8%
Dipped into depravity
89.9%
You are 40.15% pure
Average Score: 72.6%

Just to clarify, the numbers refer to how pure I am in any particular category — in other words, I’m only 1.8% pure in the “Straightness” category, so I’m 98.2% impure (not much I haven’t done) for that category. As for the rest…no, I won’t elaborate in public. So sorry. ;)