Two books to add to my future reading list: Bird of Prey by Tom Grace, and Pattern Recognition by William Gibson. Both sound interesting, and both feature Mac computers in the plot.
Okay, yeah, I’m a geek.
(via Mike Wedland)
Enthusiastically Ambiverted Hopepunk
Whatever I’m geeking out about at the time.
Two books to add to my future reading list: Bird of Prey by Tom Grace, and Pattern Recognition by William Gibson. Both sound interesting, and both feature Mac computers in the plot.
Okay, yeah, I’m a geek.
(via Mike Wedland)
There’s a lot of stuff out there on that in-tar-web thing these days, but I just haven’t felt terribly talkative as of late. It’s not really writers block as such, more of a general feeling of not having anything to add. It happens every so often.
The weekend’s been good, with a few days of lounging around, relaxing, and watching movies with Prairie (Lost in Translation, Donnie Darko, Willard, and Party Monster), and out to the Vogue to bounce around, flirt, and hang out with friends. All in all, a very enjoyable night.
I’ve gotten back into the eternal project of re-importing all my CDs into my computer — so far, I’m up to 6,913 songs over 583 albums in 30.38Gb, and that’s probably somewhere under halfway done. Yikes.
And…well, that’s about as exciting as things get right now. I’m sure my usual babble will resurface before terribly long. Until then, though…
iTunes: “Son of a Gun” by K.M.F.D.M. from the album XTORT (1996, 4:23).
…on setting a new record for the Oscars by winning every single one of the 11 Oscars that you were nominated for.
iTunes: “Judas’s Death” by Benson, Lindsay/Burns, Keith/Martin, Gary/Choir from the album Jesus Christ Superstar: The 20th Anniversary London Cast Recording (1992, 5:19).
Nick just dropped me a quick note to let me know that I’m showing up on Slashdot again. It seems that word just hit the ‘net that Microsoft has released the SDK for the upcoming XBox2, and said SDK is being distributed running on Apple PowerMac G5 dual-processor machines running a customized NT kernel. This prompted Mr. Muskrat’s comment…
Michael Hanscom almost blew the XBox2 story wide open back in October.
Remember when Microsoft fired that guy because he mentioned that they bought G5s. Too bad he didn’t know anything about why they bought them.
I did wonder a bit about the G5/Xbox2 link back in November, when news first broke that the Xbox2 would likely be running on the G5 chip. At the time, I was idly wondering about the possibility of an Xbox emulator for the Mac (similar to Connectix’ old Virtual Gamestation software that allowed Mac users to run Playstation games on their home computer).
Now, though, the news that the seeded G5’s are running a custom NT kernel has me wondering along different lines.
In February of ’03, Microsoft bought Virtual PC, the PC-emulation software for Macs that allows them to run Windows software inside an emulated PC. They’ve continued to support and update Virtual PC for the Mac, along with releasing Virtual PC for the PC, allowing Windows machines to run multiple virtual machines on one physical box — handy for software testing purposes. Unfortunately, Virtual PC depends on a feature of earlier PowerPC processors that is not present in the G5, so there hasn’t been a version of Virtual PC released yet that will run on Apple’s flagship G5 desktop machines.
Last month, Microsoft announced that a new G5-compatible version of Virtual PC would be released along with Office 2004. Considering that the Xbox2 SDK is apparently running a customized NT kernel that runs on G5 systems, could some of those same customizations be worked into Virtual PC 7, making for a major speed increase, as more of the low-level code would be running natively on the Mac rather than having to pass through an emulator? I don’t really know enough about the innards of how software like this works, so I could be entirely off-base here — the differences between the emulation required for Virtual PC and the customizations needed to get the NT kernel running on the PowerPC processor may have absolutely nothing in common — but it was enough to get me wondering.
Even more interesting, though, would be if someone could leak some form of benchmarks, even rough ones, showing what kind of performance this customized NT kernel was getting on the SDK machines. I’m assuming it must be at least somewhat respectable, as the machines are being used for creating software for the Xbox2 — but how respectable?
And going even more wildly out of the bounds of reality…for years now, there have been rumors of Apple porting the Mac OS to be able to run on Intel-based PCs (realistically, that’s not likely to ever be released publicly, but the technology is there). However, what about going the other direction? What if Microsoft were to take these customizations to their kernel and and eventually supplant Virtual PC with an actual build of Longhorn for the G5, either as a “red box” that would allow you to run Windows applications concurrently with Mac OS X applications (we can already run Mac OS X apps, “Classic” Mac OS apps, Unix command-line apps, and Unix X-11 apps all at the same time as it is), or as a dual-boot option (Which OS would you like to run today)?
Likely? I seriously doubt it. But fun to play with.
And I’d still love to find out just how zippy those G5s are running NT. Wouldn’t it be a fun little tweak if they were running as fast as (or faster, even) than high-end PCs?
Microsoft Word for the Mac versions 4 and 5 were my introductions to Word, and in the opinion of myself and many other people, were the pinnacle of Microsoft’s Mac programming.
I had a single 1.4Mb floppy disc on my first Mac (a Mac Classic) that had the MS Word program and every paper I wrote for school that year, and it ran quite happily in the 1Mb of RAM that my lil’ Classic had in it. Word 5, while not that small, was the perfect combination of features and usability, adding useful functions without becoming too much of a memory, space, or speed hog.
Then came Word 6.
Huge. Bloated. A memory hog. Dog-slow. And a truly hideous interface that only a Windows user could love (or even feel at home in).
Things have improved since then, thankfully — Word (and Office) for Mac OS X is actually useable, though I tend not to bother unless I have a really pressing need (such as getting into old archived documents laying around on my system), as the majority of my writing these days is either coding my site in BBEdit or posting via Ecto.
Still, it was quite interesting to find this look at the creation of MS Word 6 from Rick Schaut, one of the people on the team for Word 6.
Shipping a crappy product is a lot like beating your head against the wall. It really does feel good when you ship a great product as a follow-up, and it really does motivate you to spend some time trying to figure out how not to ship a crappy product again.
Mac Word 6.0 was a crappy product. And, we spent some time trying to figure out how not to do that again. In the process, we learned a few things, not the least of which was the meaning of the term “Mac-like.”
(via Scoble)
iTunes: “Homey Don’t Play Dat” by Bonnie ‘n’ Clyde from the album Terminator X and the Valley of the Jeep Beats (1991, 4:12).
The more I read about Mel Gibson’s “The Passion“, the less interested I am in seeing two hours of one man being brutally tortured to death.
However, I did love Satapher’s take on the controversy in a MeFi thread…
Wasn’t it the destiny of Jesus to die for the sins of the world? so that we might be saved?
Shouldnt this movie spark pro-semitism!? Someody had to kill the bastard — somebody had to save your soul! THANK GOD THE JEWS KILLED JESUS AND SAVED OUR SOULS.
GOD DAMN.
Okay, maybe it’s a bit wrong. But it’s really funny.
To me.
iTunes: “Wreath of Barbs (Neuroticfish 2)” by :Wumpscut: from the album Wreath of Barbs (Disc 1 – Classic Remixes) (2002, 5:11).
First, read what this gentleman has to say about the appropriation of content from other weblogs:
I was reading Dawnkeyotie’s blog and she links to the story of Tequila Mockingbird and how some young punk wannbe blogger has been stealing her material.
Now I’ll admit to being influenced by other sites, like my About This Site page borrows rather heavily from the About page at Ani Moller’s site, but stealing word for word… Just not cool.
Etiquette is the name of the game… If you want to use text, at least give proper credit, or a trackback if possible.
If you want to steal my life, go ahead, I dare you… I Double Dog Dare You™ Mofo! I may not display a copyright notice, but it’s in the source of every page on this site.
Now, with that firmly in mind, head on over and check out his site design.
Look familiar? It looks awfully familiar to me. Funny, there’s no credit given, and he’s replaced the copyright notice in my code with one of his own, implying that the design work is his.
According to his about page, the last major redesign to his site went live on Monday, Feb. 2nd of 2004. Checking his archives, here’s what we find for the redesign announcement…
You like?
I though I’d lost this new look, but luckily a few files were still on my server so for the last 12 hours I went through everything with the virtual equivalent of a fine tooth comb and cleaned it all up and finally finished what I started some 2 weeks ago.
I think it’s much nicer, but then anything is much nicer than the old b2 default template, so it makes this place my own at last.
Before you ask, yes, it looks a bit unaligned in Internet Explorer, but it looks great in Mozilla Firebird and seeing as that’s the browser I use mostly, get used to it. If I can find a way to realign in IE I will, but until then it’s just cosmetic differences.
Yes — he definitely made this place his own — as long as “his own” is rather loosely defined as “blatantly stolen from someone else”.
Sigh.
The really ridiculous thing about this, though, is that I actually do like the way my design translates to a two-column layout. Considering I occasionally toy with the idea of going back to a two-column design rather than this single-column design, if I used the same base overall look, I’d end up looking nearly exactly how he does now. Would I then have to turn around and give him credit for inspiring some of the design?
Again — oh, the irony.
(Many thanks to Firas for the tip-off.)
Update: All’s well that ends well.
In January of 2003, I put up a post pointing out Jakob Nielsen’s ‘Top ten web design mistakes’. Though his advice is generally aimed more at commercial sites than personal sites, many of the concepts will cary over from one to the other, so I used the list to evaluate my own site and see how I was doing.
That March, a visitor by the name of ‘Deakster‘ [Deakster’s site may come up with a ‘403 forbidden’ error if you attempt clicking on his link, as I think he may be denying any visitors referred by my website.] came by the page and left a mildly snide comment about Nielsen and his company. Not in itself a big deal, but when I visited the URL left by Deakster, I found that his own site was coded in such a way as to require Internet Explorer, and would not load for me using Safari on my Mac or Mozilla on my PC. I mentioned this in a reply comment, that was that, and I didn’t think any more of it.
Last week, almost a year since he left his original comment, Deakster came back. This time, apparently incensed by my reply to his first comment, he took it upon himself to critique myself and one of my sites (specifically, what little is left at djwudi.com) in two comments left back-to-back.
Needless to say, I was a little amused by this (not just that he attempted to take me to task, and that he did so quite poorly, but mostly that he came back nearly a full year after his last and only previous comment to my site), and responded in turn. Again, Deakster wasn’t thrilled, started to leave more comments, but soon requested that I remove all of his comments from the page, declaring that he “no longer wanted to be associated with the site.”
Unfortunately, I wasn’t actually at my computer when his request first came through, so twenty minutes later he made the same request again.
It wasn’t long after that that I did get the message, however, and while I didn’t remove the comment placeholders from the page (I saw no reason to remove my comments, and as they were replies to his, I didn’t like the idea of out-and-out deleting his comments and ‘orphaning’ mine). I did, however, remove the text of his comments, indicating that I had done so at his request.
Apparently that wasn’t good enough.
I now have 75 bogus trackback pings on that post, courtesy of my new friend, with messages such as “Michael is a first class prick and should keep his mouth shut,” “Take on a haxor an end up with an app that autopost shit to yer crap site,” “Your blog aint sexy and neither is your bald spot,” “Why are yanks such fools — cause they are all like Michael,” and his final ultimatum, “Had enough Michael — i will leave it if you delete everything I want deleting and I mean everything.”
Why, I do believe I’m being harassed, ladies and gentlemen.
All of Deakster’s comments over the past few days and every one of the bogus TrackBack pings has come from IP address 81.152.149.121. Unfortunately, while I could ban that IP address from commenting, I don’t believe that there is currently a way to ban TrackBack pings by IP.
So what now?
Obviously, I certainly could “delete-everything-i-want-deleting-and-i-mean-everything” all of Deakster’s comments (and TrackBack pings) easily enough, but something tells me that he’ll likely not be satisfied until I also expunge my reply (which contains quotes from his comments) also, which I’m in no great hurry to do (hey, I had fun responding to his attacks…). Besides, giving in to script kiddies (a category I wouldn’t have put Deakster in until I got the TrackBack ping flood) isn’t my idea of a good time. ;)
Downhill Battle has posted a followup to yesterday’s ‘Grey Tuesday’ event:
GREY TUESDAY EXCEEDED everyone’s expectations. When we put the word out about this protest, we had no idea how many sites would join in (over 400 did). When EMI’s lawyers sent threatening letters on Monday afternoon to people who were planning to host the album, we had no idea how many would risk getting sued to make this important political stand (over 170 did). We didn’t know we’d get messages of solidarity from prominent political and intellectual forces like the EFF and Lawrence Lessig, but we did (and thanks). All of us who took part in this protest have done a lot to spur a rethinking of copyright law in terms of what’s good for musicians and what’s good for our music culture. And we’ve made it more apparent than ever how the major record labels have twisted the original purpose of copyright law (“to promote the progress of science and the useful arts”) in order to suppress music that doesn’t flow from their system.
They have links at the bottom of their post to some of the stories about Grey Tuesday that showed up in the media, including one fron the New York Times.
iTunes: “Electricity” by Apoptygma Berzerk (5:08).
It’s Grey Tuesday…
It’s time for music fans to stand up and demand change from the music industry’s copyright cartel.
Tuesday, February 24 will be a day of coordinated civil disobedience: websites will post Danger Mouse’s Grey Album on their site for 24 hours in protest of EMI’s attempts to censor this work.
DJ Danger Mouse created a remix of Jay-Z’s the Black Album and the Beatles White Album, and called it the Grey Album. Jay-Z’s record label, Roc-A-Fella, released an a capella version of his Black Album specifically to encourage remixes like this one. But despite praise from music fans and major media outlets like Rolling Stone (“an ingenious hip-hop record that sounds oddly ahead of its time”) and the Boston Globe (which called it the “most creatively captivating” album of the year), EMI has sent cease and desist letters demanding that stores destroy their copies of the album and websites remove them from their site. EMI claims copyright control of the Beatles 1968 White Album.
Danger Mouse’s album is one of the most “respectful” and undeniably positive examples of sampling; it honors both the Beatles and Jay-Z. Yet the lawyers and bureaucrats at EMI have shown zero flexibility and not a glimmer of interest in the artistic significance of this work. And without a clearly defined right to sample (e.g. compulsory licensing), the five major record labels will continue to use copyright in a reactionary and narrowly self-interested manner that limits and erodes creativity. Their actions are also self-defeating: good new music is being created that people want to buy, but the major labels are so obsessed with hoarding their copyrights that they are literally turning customers away.
This first-of-its-kind protest signals a refusal to let major label lawyers control what musicians can create and what the public can hear. The Grey Album is only one of the thousands of legitimate and valuable efforts that have been stifled by the record industry– not to mention the ones that were never even attempted because of the current legal climate. We cannot allow these corporations to continue censoring art; we need common-sense reforms to copyright law that can make sampling legal and practical for artists.
The Grey Tuesday protest is being organized by Downhill Battle, a music activism project that has no affiliation with Danger Mouse.
And on that note…
Update:
Much as I’d like to continue this, I just joined the many people who have been sent “Cease and Desist” letters. I debated leaving the links up, but should the lawyers decide to follow through, there’s no way I’d be able to put up a fight (not that I’d have any money to give them anyway, but it’d be more hassle than I want to deal with). I’m sure that many other sites will continue to offer the Grey Album over the course of the day, and possibly beyond, and I wish them the best of luck.
This time, though, I’d rather record that I made my statement of support and participated until receiving the Cease and Desist — at which time, for my own protection and peace of mind, I did just that.
The letter I received follows (though it’s the same letter that other sites were getting yesterday)…
From: JCJ\@cll.com
Subject: The Grey Album and Misappropriation of Capital Records, Inc.’s Sound Recordings
Date: February 24, 2004 9:50:43 PST
To: djwudi\@myrealbox.comCowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C.
LAW OFFICES
1133 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036-6799
Telephone (212) 790-9200
Web www.cll.com
Fax (212) 575-0671Re: The Grey Album and Misappropriation of Capitol Records, Inc.’s Sound Recordings
To Whom It May Concern:
We are counsel to Capitol Records, Inc. (“Capitol”), the exclusive U.S. licensee and/or owner and distributor of musical sound recordings featuring performances by The Beatles. We write concerning your announced intention of distributing an unlawful and unauthorized sound recording known as The Grey Album on February 24, 2004. This infringing album contains extensive samples from recorded performances by the Beatles, including “Long, Long, Long,” “While My Guitar Gently Weeps,” “Glass Onion,” “Savoy Truffle,” “Mother Nature’s Son,” “Helter Skelter,” “Julia,” “Happiness is Warm Gun,” “Piggies,” “Dear Prudence,” “Rocky Raccoon,” “Revolution 1,” “Revolution 9,” “I’m So Tired,” and “Cry Baby Cry” (the “Capitol Recordings”). Distribution of The Grey Album constitutes a serious violation of Capitol’s rights in the Capitol Recordings as well as the valuable intellectual property rights of other artists, music publishers, and/or record companies and will subject you to serious legal remedies for willful violation of the laws. We accordingly demand that you cease any plans or efforts to distribute or publicly perform this unlawful recording.
As you are no doubt aware, The Grey Album is an amalgamation created by an individual named Brian Burton (a/k/a Danger Mouse) of Jay-Z’s The Black Album and the Beatles’ self-titled 1968 album commonly known as The White Album. There is no dispute that The Grey Album incorporates Capitol Recordings, as Mr. Burton acknowledges on his website (http://www.djdangermouse.com) that “every kick, snare, and chord is taken from the Beatles White Album and is in their original recording somwhere [sic].” There is also no dispute that Mr. Burton never requested permission from any of the rights-holders to create The Grey Album.
Capitol has demanded that Mr. Burton cease distribution of The Grey Album, and Mr. Burton has indicated publicly that he intends to comply with Capitol’s demands. As reported by Reuters on February 17, 2004:
Danger Mouse said he created the record strictly as a limited-edition promotional item, with only a few thousand copies pressed . . . .
The artist, whose real name is Brian Burton, has agreed to comply with the order and will no longer distribute copies. “He just wanted people to hear the record,” says a spokesman in the U.K.
Reuters has also quoted Mr. Burton as saying, “[t]his wasn’t supposed to happen . . . . I just sent out a few tracks (and) now online stores are selling it and people are downloading it all over the place.” By further distributing The Grey Album, you will not only be violating the rights of those who own the recordings and compositions at issue. You will also be interfering with the intention of the very artist whose rights you purport to vindicate.
We are aware of the so-called “Grey Tuesday” event, sponsored by http://www.downhillbattle.org and described on the http://www.greytuesday.org website as a “day of coordinated civil disobedience” in which participating sites will make the unlawful Grey Album available for downloading, distribution, and file-sharing in order to force “reforms to copyright law that can make sampling legal.” Your site is listed among those that will engage in this openly unlawful conduct. Any unauthorized distribution, reproduction, public performance, and/or other exploitation of The Grey Album will constitute, among other things, common law copyright infringement/misappropriation, unfair competition, and unjust enrichment rendering you and anyone engaged with you in such acts liable for all of the remedies provided by relevant laws. These remedies include but are not limited to preliminary and permanent injunctive relief as well as monetary and punitive damages necessary to remedy your openly willful violation of Capitol’s rights.
We accordingly demand you:
- cease and desist from the actual or intended distribution, reproduction, public performance or other exploitation of The Grey Album and any other unauthorized uses of the Capitol Recordings or any other sound recordings owned and/or controlled by Capitol;
- identify the names and addresses of any third parties who have supplied you with physical or digital copies of The Grey Album or who are otherwise involved in The Grey Album‘s unauthorized distribution, reproduction, public performance, or other exploitation;
- provide Capitol with an accounting of all units of The Grey Album that have been distributed via your website, either physically or digitally, and of all instances of public performance of The Grey Album rendered via your website; and
- preserve any and all documents and records relating to this matter, including but not limited to electronic data and other information which may be relevant/discoverable in the event of litigation.
In addition, to the extent that you have already commenced distribution of The Grey Album, you must make payment to Capitol in an amount to be discussed. We demand that you contact us immediately.
Unless we receive full and immediate compliance with these demands, Capitol will be forced to consider pursuing any and all available remedies at law and in equity.
Nothing herein shall be deemed an admission or waiver of any rights or remedies of Capitol and/or its affiliates, all of which are hereby expressly reserved.
Sincerely,
/s/ J. Christopher Jensen
J. Christopher Jensen
Telephone (direct dial): (212) 790-9204
Email: JCJ\@cll.com
Note that this is a boilerplate letter that has been sent out to many (if not all) sites participating in Grey Tuesday (to the point that to post it here, I had to edit out glitches that had popped up during many forwards and re-sends that the legal counsel had not bothered to clean out of the text of the e-mail).
Item one of the demands has been complied with.
Items two through four I have no intention of complying with, and according to Downhill Battle’s lawyers can be ignored.
Lawyers have advised us that we can ignore your demands number 2, 3, and 4 that are listed at the bottom of your letter. EMI has no legal right to make these demands and we will not comply with them.
Good luck to all the other participants.
And lastly, with thanks to adam b. and The Beatles:
have you seen the little piggies
crawling in the dirt?
and for all the little piggies
life is getting worse
always having dirt
to play around inhave you seen the bigger piggies
in their starched white shirts?
you will find the bigger piggies
stirring up the dirt
they always have clean shirts
to play around inin their sties with all their backing
they don’t care what goes on aroundin their eyes, there’s something lacking
what they need’s a damn good whacking
— The Beatles, “Piggies”, from The White Album
iTunes: “Hass” by Das Ich from the album Relikt (Disc 1) (2003, 7:09).