Credit where credit is due

Wil’s request for a WMV-to-Qicktime converter reminded me of something that I’ve had rattling around in my head for a bit.

I’m fairly obvious about having a strong anti-Microsoft bias. However, I do have to admit (and really don’t mind doing so) that the Macintosh team at Microsoft does some truly kick-ass work. Nearly everything that MS has produced for the Mac in the past few years has been fairly impressive. Even with as much as I bash Internet Explorer in all its variations, when IE 5 for Mac OS X was released, it was the best browser on the market. The fact that it’s since been superceded by other browsers and subsequently abandoned by Microsoft isn’t the fault of the Mac team there, I’m sure.

What popped this into my head a couple weeks ago was, of all things, the driver software for the Microsoft Office keyboard, Intellitype Pro. Where the PC version of the software is its own standalone application, the Mac version of the software integrates right into the OS X control panel. More of a standout feature, though, is the fact that on the Mac, you can assign special functions to all the extra special keys on an application-by-application basis — something which I hardly thought about until I tried to do the same thing on my PC and discovered that it wasn’t possible. Score one more for the Mac team.

All that said, though, there is one glaring exception to the rule — and that’s the Mac version of Windows Media Player. Horrid little application, that one. I’m more surprised when I find a .wmv file that it can open, and even then, performace (at least on my 350Mhz G3) is abysmal. At least that’s the only stumbling block I’ve seen from them. I can’t say that I’m too distraught over having limited-to-nonexistant Windows Media functionality on my Mac, anyway.

So, that’s it, really. Kudos to the Microsoft at Mac team. Now, why don’t you all go tell the rest of the company how to write decent software? ;)

(Oh, and incidentally, I was also looking for a WMV-to-Quicktime converter a couple weeks ago, and found diddley.)

Diebold's voting machines

There’s a good article on Salon looking at the issues with Diebold’s electronic voting machines, which are being used to replace troublesome punch-card voting machines after the 2000 voting debacle. It doesn’t look like our votes are any safer under the new system.

…according to Bev Harris, a writer who has spent more than a year investigating the shadowy world of the elections equipment industry, the replacement technologies the court cited may be worse — much worse — than the zany punch-card systems it finds so abhorrent. Specifically, Harris’ research into Diebold, one of the largest providers of the new touch-screen systems, ought to give elections officials pause about mandating an all-electronic vote.

Harris has found critical flaws in Diebold’s voting software, and she’s uncovered internal Diebold memos in which employees seem to suggest that the vulnerabilities are no big deal. The memos appear to be authentic — Diebold even sent Harris a notice warning her that by posting the documents on the Web, she was infringing upon the company’s intellectual property. Diebold did not return several calls for comment.

Not only has Diebold refused to comment, they’ve gone so far as to force Bev Harris to take down her site exposing the vulnerabilities.

Due to a dispute with Diebold, Incorporated, and its wholly owned subsidiary Diebold Election Systems, Inc. (collectively “Diebold”), which is claiming links to certain materials that do not reside on the blackboxvoting.org website constitute  copyright infringement, blackboxvoting.org has been temporarily disabled.

Congressman Rush Holt has sponsored a bill that would require electronic voting machines to produce a paper trail — this measure should definitely be supported.

(via Kos, [Kos [again]], Chris)

Other reactions to Bush's UN speech

  • Slate: Bush to World: Drop Dead! The president lays an egg at the U.N.

    Has an American president ever delivered such a bafflingly impertinent speech before the General Assembly as the one George W. Bush gave this morning?

  • Star Tribune: Strib’s view of the speech Editorial: Bush at the U.N. / For good reason, he lacks credibility

    During the 2000 campaign, Bush famously spoke of the need for the United States to be a strong but humble nation. In action, his foreign policy has been predicated on being strong and arrogant. The president gives good speeches. Too bad that they can’t be believed.

  • Washington Post: A Vague Pitch Leaves Mostly Puzzlement

    In his speech today to the U.N. General Assembly, President Bush tried to walk a fine line between defending a war deeply unpopular in much of the world and looking for help from reluctant countries to rebuild Iraq. The result left diplomats and lawmakers puzzled about his ultimate intentions.

(via Atrios and Joe Rospars)

Inappropriate sexual arousal for teens

Concerned parents in Texas want to ban Brave New World and Stranger in a Strange Land.

The board of directors for the South Texas Independent School District is expected to decide tonight whether to ban two books — Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World and Robert Heinlein’s Stranger in a Strange Land — from the high school’s 10th grade English Advanced Placement curriculum.

The books, part of the class’ summer reading list, may lead to “inappropriate sexual arousal of young teens,” parent Julie Wilde wrote in her complaint to the district.

Obviously (to me, at least), this is patently stupid. But I did have one question.

Would Ms. Wilde be so kind as to suggest some alternate reading that provides appropriate sexual arousal for young teens?

Britney Spears’ autobiography, perhaps?

(via Go Fish)

More on Gibson's 'The Passion'

Dad sent me a couple articles over the last few days looking at Mel Gibson’s “The Passion“, lately seeming to be the most controversial religious film that almost no one’s seen since Dogma was in pre-release. Anyway, if you’re at all interested in the film or the controversy around it, both of these are worth a look.

‘You Can’t Whitewash the Events of the Bible’: New Testament scholar Darrell Bock recently spoke with Beliefnet about Mel Gibson’s film “The Passion,” which dramatizes the last hours of Jesus. Critics–including Catholic biblical scholars and the Anti-Defamation League–have raised concerns about the movie’s historicity and its portrayal of Jewish authorities. Bock saw a rough cut of the film in late August.

What Mel Missed: Most of us have yet to see Mel Gibson’s “The Passion,” but we’ve gained one sure impression: it’s bloody. “I wanted to bring you there,” Gibson told Peter J. Boyer in September 15’s New Yorker magazine. “I wanted to be true to the Gospels. That has never been done before.”

Shaolin Soccer needs to be released, dammit

Among the top 10 movies downloaded on the Internet in August were the usual blockbusters: Pirates of the Caribbean, The Hulk, Matrix Reloaded … and Shaolin Soccer.

Can’t say as I’m surprised, I’ve been waiting for word of its release since I first saw the trailers. I don’t do the online downloading thing, either, so c’mon, Mirimax — get your act together and release this thing!

Matrix/Web

This is cute — an introduction to CSS-based website design, Matrix style.

Let me tell you why you’re here. You’re here because you know something. What you know you can’t explain but you feel it, that there’s something wrong with the web. You don’t know what it is but it’s there like a splinter in your mind driving you mad.

You can see it when you look out your browser window or when you turn on your web tv. You can feel it when you go to work, when you go to church, when you pay your taxes.

This is the web that you know. The web as it was at the end of the twentieth century.

This is the web as it exists today…

Welcome To The Desert Of The Web

(via WebGraphics)

Bush's U.N. address

Bits and pieces from yesterday’s address to the U.N. by President Bush:

The Taliban was a sponsor and servant of terrorism. When confronted, that regime chose defiance, and that regime is no more.

The regime of Saddam Hussein cultivated ties to terror while it built weapons of mass destruction. It used those weapons in acts of mass murder, and refused to account for them when confronted by the world. The Security Council was right to be alarmed. The Security Council was right to demand that Iraq destroy its illegal weapons and prove that it had done so. The Security Council was right to vow serious consequences if Iraq refused to comply. And because there were consequences, because a coalition of nations acted to defend the peace, and the credibility of the United Nations, Iraq is free, and today we are joined by representatives of a liberated country.

Do I even need to link to anything? We’ve found no evidence of nuclear or biological weapons. The rationale for war has shifted over the months from “Saddam has WMDs” to “Saddam’s making WMDs” to “Saddam was planning to make WMDs” to “We’re liberating the people of Iraq (because all our other justifications haven’t panned out [and oh yeah, just ignore the fact that the country’s in worse shape than when it started])”. And yet Bush still hauls out that excuse for his actions. It’s almost laughable, except for what has been done in the name of those nonexistant WMDs.

The Iraqi people are meeting hardships and challenges, like every nation that has set out on the path of democracy.

Hardships and challenges that include losing valuable contracts to rebuild their own nation to American Bush-backed companies that charge ludicrously inflated prices.

Across the Middle East, people are safer because an unstable aggressor has been removed from power. Across the world, nations are more secure because an ally of terror has fallen.

That “unstable aggressor” may be removed from power, but do we know where he is? Or where Osama bin Laden, the man that we believe was actually behind the 9-11 attacks is? They’re both loose, and while the U.S. occupies Iraq, more and more people in the middle east see us as an occupying force creating a police state. In other words, the bad guys. I certainly don’t feel any safer now knowing that every day more and more people, sick of what the U.S. is doing in Iraq, may be searching out other people loyal to Saddam or bin Laden and planning ways to take their revenge on the U.S.

Our actions in Afghanistan and Iraq were supported by many governments, and America is grateful to each one.

Of course, many of those governments were as bad as or worse than Iraq. Such fine company we keep.

Our international coalition in Iraq is meeting it responsibilities. We are conducting precision raids against terrorists and holdouts of the former regime.

And they’re conducting less-precise, but equally effective, raids against U.S. and U.N. forces in Iraq.

Our coalition has made sure that Iraq’s former dictator will never again use weapons of mass destruction.

Considering that he’s on the loose and we don’t know where he is, I’d almost expect that he’d be more likely to find WMDs now if he is free to travel around and make good contacts on the black market than when he was busy holding the reins on a country that wasn’t able to work on a WMD program due to international supervision.

We’re training Iraqi police and border guards and a new army, so the Iraqi people can assume full responsibility for their own security.

Of course, it’ll be easier for them to do their jobs if we’d stop accidentally shooting them.

The old regime built palaces while letting schools decay, so we are rebuilding more than a thousand schools. The old regime starved hospitals of resources, so we have helped to supply and reopen hospitals across Iraq. The old regime built up armies and weapons, while allowing the nation’s infrastructure to crumble, so we are rehabilitating power plants, water and sanitation facilities, bridges and airports.

Now wouldn’t it be nice if someone would flip this around and do the same for the U.S.?

That’s enough. I’m only about halfway through his address, but something tells me it doesn’t get any better from there, and I’ve got to get ready for work. You get the point, I’m sure.

The King is a fink.

(via Kos)

Future plans

Tentative plans for the next few months:

  • Get a recent copy of my credit report.
  • Starting with the smaller bills and working my way up, pay off my debts.
  • Once my credit is a bit more bearable than it is now (at least, far fewer outstanding debts)…
  • Apply for financial aid/loans/grants.
  • Apply to school (possibly Central Washington University).
  • Pursue getting a degree — leaning towards some form of education/teaching degree.

Now, this is all fairly tentative at the moment, but I’ve been toying with the idea of getting back into school for some time now, and it just may be time to start finally working towards that. We’ll see where things go from here.

Bugfixes are good

Well, that was a nice surprise. I just updated my Mac to OS X 10.2.8, and on restart, discovered a bug fix.

I’ve had an issue for a while now with my iPod where if I restart the machine with the iPod plugged in, it doesn’t behave correctly after the restart. It will mount to the Finder fine, but iTunes and iSync don’t recognize it at all. The only fix is to unmount and unplug it, shut down the machine, and then unplug the machine’s power cord and let it sit for five minutes before powering it on again — apparently this will clear a frozen FireWire port.

I forgot to unplug the iPod after installing the update tonight, though, and was pleasantly surprised to see iSync and iTunes launching after login, indicating that they saw the iPod without a hitch. Nice!