Abigail

Abigail (2024): ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

The “demon baby” genre is a particular favorite of ours, and this one is a lot of fun. A bit of Agatha Christie, a bit of The Ransom of Red Chief, and a lot of blood (it is a vampire movie, after all). The creepy kid is nicely creepy, the unfortunate criminal crew of misfits is appropriately dysfunctional, and everyone understands the assignment. Absolutely worth a watch.

Forever Peace by Joe Haldeman

54/2024 – ⭐️⭐️⭐️ 1998 Hugo Best Novel

This is one of those that, while unquestionably good, was difficult for me to really get into and ultimately just didn’t resonate with me. Impressively (and sometimes depressingly) prescient in some ways, I think that a lot of it was simply too directly relatable to present social and political realities that it was hard for me to enjoy it.

Me holding Forever Peace

Smut Peddler X: Ten Years of Impeccable Pornoglyphics edited by Andrea Purcell

53/2024 – ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

I picked up the original version of this book ten years ago, during its Kickstarter campaign, when an online acquaintance who contributed a story was promoting it. I enjoyed it then, and it was fun to revisit it a decade later, especially as I hadn’t re-read it since then, so had forgotten the majority of the stories, and the new content looking back at the original project was a nice addition. As with the six other books that now exist in the “Smut Peddler” series (seven if you count this 10th anniversary version separately), all of which live on my shelves, it’s a very enjoyable collection of fun, inclusive, explicit sexytimes.

For fun, my review of the original release: “I actually read this last year when I got the .pdf version from the Kickstarter project, the physical book was delivered earlier this year. I found the Kickstarter when one of my friends announced that she was contributing a piece to the project. Perhaps not my usual reading material, but I really enjoyed all of it — I don’t remember there being a bad entry in the bunch, and quite a few extremely good stories. Not at all disappointed to have it in my collection, and I’ll be adding the second volume when it’s Kickstarter project goes live.”

Me holding Smut Peddler X

Lost to Eternity by Greg Cox

52/2024 – ⭐️⭐️⭐️

Almost four stars…but not quite. There are three connected storylines (it’s not a spoiler if it’s in the back cover blurb, right?): A modern-day (2024) true crime podcaster investigating the mysterious disappearance of one Gillian Taylor in 1986, Kirk and company in the third year of their original voyage rescuing an abducted scientist, and Kirk and company escorting envoys to a conference shortly before the events of The Undiscovered Country. Of the three storylines, I found the latter two to be fairly standard Trek adventure, and would occasionally get confused as to which point in time I was in for a moment when I switched chapters. However, the first storyline, as the podcaster tracks down various minor characters from The Voyage Home to try to figure out what happened to Gillian is great. I really enjoyed the glimpse into what happened on Earth after the events of the movie, and it was a lot of fun to build on many of the gags from the film. That storyline is by far the strongest, and the middle story is the weakest, with yet another “landing party beams down to a pre-industrial society and — surprise! — makes a complete hash of the Prime Directive” situation.
Still, even the weaker parts are entertaining, and Cox ties in lots of little nods to a lot of Trek true canon and beta (book) canon.

(This reaches my goal of 52 books read this year, nice and early! We’ll see how many I end up with in a few more months.)

Me holding Lost to Eternity

Legacy lenses and a bit of privilege

(Collecting and editing together a Mastodon thread. Nothing new to see if you follow me there.)

This past weekend I went down to Portland to visit my mom, and all the photos I took were shot using lenses from her dad’s (film) Konica Minolta, attached to my Nikon D750 using a lens adapter. The lenses date from sometime after 1976, according to what I’ve been able to determine from a little web research), and require shooting all manual (which is a good skill to brush up on from time to time anyway), and it was a lot of fun to do.

A Nikon D750 DSLR sits on a coffee table. Attached to it is an 1970s Konica lens, while a Vivitar lens from the same era sits nearby.

The weekend’s photos are now in a Flickr album. I really like the quality of these; they’re definitely not as “clean” as I get with more modern lenses, but the flaws of the older glass produce some neat effects, particularly in lower-light situations where I’m shooting wide open. Not an everyday lens choice, to be sure, but definitely worth bringing out from time to time.

Portland Weekend July 2024

And finally, a funny-but-serious (to me, in retrospect) story about this photo:

A pane of shattered glass, with cracks radiating out from a central impact point; a smaller impact point is just to one side. Behind the glass and artfully out of focus are sparkling pieces of jewelry.

After spending the morning at the Pittock Mansion, mom and I needed lunch, and wanted to find someplace air conditioned, since it was a 90°+ day in Portland. So we went to a close-ish mall, the Lloyd Center, not knowing that it is virtually abandoned — I’d be surprised if it was at 30% capacity. Empty space after empty space, with just a few stragglers trying to hold on, mostly grouped around the ice rink at the mall’s center.

After eating some mediocre Orange Julius chili dogs and watching a bit of a Willy Wonka on Ice production on the ice rink (because, sure, why not toss some random Roald Dahl in), we were wandering on when we passed a jewelry store. One of the display case windows of the store had been shattered by something, leaving a very prominent starburst pattern in the glass. This caught my eye, and I figured I’d see what kind of shot I could get, with the cracked window and the sparkle of the jewelry behind it.

Being in “absent minded art brain” mode, I didn’t even think about what this might look like until, through the viewfinder, I noticed the store employees looking at me and gesturing in my direction. Suddenly very conscious of the situation, I put the camera down as a pleasant looking lady came out to talk with me. As it turns out, as soon as I apologized for not thinking about the optics of the situation and explained what I was doing, it turned out that she was also a bit of an amateur photographer, and we had a nice little chat about the window, how the shatter effect looked, and what sort of shots I might get. And then, after another little laugh about the whole thing, we all moved on.

But as we walked away, I couldn’t help but think about the rather stark privilege in the experience. Wandering through a down-at-heels mall, passing a jewelry store that someone had likely tried to rob, blithely taking photos of the damage, and walking away with a pleasant conversation and funny story. I have to think that would have turned out differently if I hadn’t been a 51 year old white man wandering around with his disabled mother in a powered chair. But in the moment? I just thought it would be a neat photo.

Another Fine Myth by Robert Asprin

51/2024 – ⭐️⭐️⭐️

The Myth series has been on my radar for years, so when I saw the first five books at the local library sale a couple months ago, I snapped them up. This first one is…ehh. It’s okay. It’s not bad, but neither did it wow me. Maybe it’s because it’s the first in the series, maybe because it was written in ’78 and I’m reading it in ’24, maybe because I’m more of an SF reader, maybe it’s because I’ve fairly recently read the first few Discworld books and enjoyed them more than I did this, and maybe it’s some combination of all of those factors, but I was somewhat underwhelmed. As long as I have the next four, I’ll keep reading and see if they improve, though. (Also, why is Aahz about two feet taller than he should be on the cover art?)

Me holding Another Fine Myth

Harris 2024

I didn’t think Biden needed to drop out. I still believe that he was fine; he’s been making verbal gaffes his entire career, has been open about dealing with a stutter, and has admitted to having an extremely unfortunate off night in a debate against someone extremely difficult to debate because of the “Gish gallop” technique that Trump habitually uses of overwhelming his opponent with a torrent of bullshit so that it’s incredibly difficult to counter because there’s simply so much that’s false. I’m pretty convinced that Biden is the victim of a coordinated media campaign pushing the “he’s too old” narrative (while notably ignoring all the cognitive red flags that Trump displays in addition to the impending fascist dictatorship he promises), because the major media outlets are owned and controlled by a small group of wealthy white men who saw their positions of power threatened by the policies that Biden has implemented and planned to continue implementing.

That said:

I hope that Biden’s endorsement is heeded, that the initial endorsements from other big party names are also heeded, and that Harris gets the nomination. She hasn’t been quite as visible, and has certainly had her share of detractors, but she’s been the other half of the Biden/Harris administration for the past three and a half years, and it would be foolish to believe her voice hasn’t been part of it all. I’ve seen lots of people floating Buttigieg for VP, and I have no immediate issue with that (and do like the optics of putting up a ticket of a woman of color and a gay man).

I believe that Harris can win. But more importantly, I believe that we need to believe that Harris can win, and we need to do so vocally, because the more people say “she can’t win”, the more less informed people will see that and assume that it’s true because people who they see as more informed (which they must be, because they’re saying something) are saying so, and it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.

I think she’s a good candidate. I think she’d be good in office. I’d love to see her voted in, rather than (as one theory espoused) gaining the office because Biden can’t fulfill a term. And there’s simply no question that she’d be better than the alternative.
And this doesn’t mean don’t talk about those areas where she could be better. Yes, to many, her policing and prosecutorial background is a strike against her (though it’s worth noting that given that the opponent is a career criminal, maybe her experience, even if you’re not fond of it, might actually come in handy). Part of our job is to make our concerns known in the hopes of influencing those we elect. Many of Biden’s positions have grown and evolved over time, in large part because of the pressure he got from those in the party and those of his constituents who were further to the left than he started.

So I’m not saying don’t voice concerns. I’m saying along with your concerns, recognize that she (or, really, should she not get the nomination, whoever does, as virtually anyone the Dems nominate will be a better choice than Trump) is the best option, and the only option that doesn’t contribute to installing a fascist dictatorship, and give her your support. (Or, if you really can’t stomach that, at least don’t pop off with saying she “can’t” win; she absolutely can. If the left was half as good at supporting their candidates, even with flaws, as the right is, instead of tearing them down for not being paragons of perfection, we’d be in far better shape now than we are.)

Also, keep in mind that many of the people who were against Biden will also be against Harris, some for similar reasons (assuming she’ll continue the direction Biden was going), some for reasons specific to her (chiefly, of course, that she’s a woman of color). So when you start seeing all the anti-Harris links pop up, think long and hard about who is posting them, what the sources are, and why maybe you shouldn’t take them at face value. Because this is still going to be a battle.

But it’s a battle we can win.

Harris can win.