Just in case it wasn’t clear where I stand.
I don’t care how old you are, I believe you are who you tell me you are.
Enthusiastically Ambiverted Hopepunk
Just in case it wasn’t clear where I stand.
I don’t care how old you are, I believe you are who you tell me you are.
The more I think about the Section 31 movie, the more I think that there’s a possibility that it might have one good outcome: Solidifying Section 31 as being nothing more than a run-of-the-mill black ops/special forces/Delta Force/Seal Team Six/Mission Impossible/whatever department, and therefore 1) not the Big Scary Thing it was originally presented as, 2) not something we really need to be terribly concerned about or excited by, and 3) not something we really need to spend any more time on.
As Edgar Anderson (@pithyphrase.net) noted on Bluesky:
In Deep Space Nine, it was never 100% to me whether Section 31 actually existed or Sloane was just a very capable but insane person acting on his own. I wish that ambiguity had been maintained.
As far as I’m concerned, this — or perhaps something that’s a little bit of both — is the best way to look at Section 31. While the “sooper sekret ‘good bad guys’ doing the dirty work so you fragile little snowflakes can have your Federation utopia” idea fit with DS9’s take on the Trek universe, for me, Sloane’s ambiguous nature is part of what made DS9’s Section 31 bearable. For a concept that was so very antithetical to the established Star Trek universe, having it be presented as a “…wait…really? Or is he…no. But…maybe?” thing worked, and worked well. Maybe it was a thing. Maybe he was a very talented psychopath.
But then, over the years, particularly with Discovery diving down the Section 31 rabbit hole in ways that made no sense with the concept (the super-secret covert ops branch of the Federation that almost nobody knows about, exists only in the shadows, and will be denied at every opportunity if mentioned, has its own all-black comm badges and fancy ships, for V’ger’s sake), and now this particularly “meh” attempt at merging Mission Impossible with Star Trek, it’s time to give up on the concept.
Just write it off as a special forces unit that, both on the individual member level and the institutional level, let its ego get far too out of control, and while it has occasionally been useful, it has also occasionally been dangerously embarrassing and embarrassingly dangerous, and it needs to be disbanded. Both in-universe and out here in the real world.
Let it go.
Book 5 of 2025: Triangulum by Subodhana Wijeyeratne.
Second Philip K. Dick award nominee of the year. As such, not reviewed.
🎥: Star Trek: Section 31 (2025): ⭐️⭐️
Well, that was definitely a movie. Strip out the Trek references and call it “Generic Space Spies”, and it would be an entirely acceptable and inoffensive, if not particularly groundbreaking, direct-to-video movie. As a Trek film…well, it’s a generic space spy movie with Trek references. Doesn’t break anything, but doesn’t really add anything to the franchise, either. Michelle Yeoh is always fun, the cast does acceptable jobs, and it’d play in the background during a “Trek movie marathon while I clean the house” session just fine.
For more spoilery thoughts that I jotted down as I was watching it, see this Mastodon post.
🎥: Johnny English (2003): ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Rowan Atkinson’s take on a Bond spoof is an entertaining bit of fluff. Atkinson himself is fun to watch as he flips between a variation on his rubber-faced Bean buffoonery and occasionally slipping into actually projecting the suave confidence of a Bond-style spy. It’s ridiculous and silly, and that’s fine.
🎥: Wallace & Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl (2024): ⭐️⭐️⭐️
You really can’t go wrong with W&G, particularly when there’s an evil mastermind penguin in the mix. As cute and silly as ever.
As part of the Great Facebook Exodus of January 2025, I’ve seen a few people talking about Dreamwidth, generally in the context of going there, going back there, or already being there and letting people know.
So, what the heck? Since I already have this blog, I’m not moving there, but I did set up an account (with my usual djwudi username) and, assuming I have things configured correctly, any posts here should automagically mirror over thataway. This post is mostly a bit of rambling so I have something to send that way to test the setup.
If it works? Great! If not? Um…more fiddling, I guess.
Edit: Well, it worked! So that’s good.
Book 4 of 2025: Your Utopia by Bora Chung, translated by Anton Hur.
First Philip K. Dick award nominee of the year. As such, not reviewed.
Book 3 of 2025: Clarkesworld Issue 220, edited by Neil Clarke. ⭐️⭐️⭐️
My favorites this issue were “Never Eaten Vegetables” by H.H. Pak, “The Temporary Murder of Thomas Monroe” by Tia Tashiro, and “Autonomy” by Meg Elison.
This year’s nominees for the Philip K. Dick award were announced today, and I already have my copies! Looking forward to diving in as soon as I’m done with the book I’m currently reading.
Amusingly, I only had to order five. I’d picked up Triangulum last year at Norwescon, and just hadn’t gotten around to reading it yet. Guess it’s time!